The introduction of biodegradable and compostable packaging has been a signifcant milestone in reducing conventional plastic use, particularly in sectors that prioritize sustainability like the organic food industry. This study explores the factors infuencing the selection of such packaging, with a specifc focus on the role of emotions in a representative sample of Italian consumers. Two models, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Rational-Emotional Model (REM), were evaluated and compared. The TPB model confrms that positive attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control infuence the intention to choose biodegradable and compostable packaging. The REM reveals that environmental concern, cognitive benefts, and emotions signifcantly impact purchase intentions. The REM explains a greater variance in intention compared to the TPB model, highlighting the importance of combining rational and emotional components. Biodegradable and compostable packaging aligns well with the target consumers of organic food, making it an excellent solution for organic produce. Emotions play a crucial role in shaping consumer intentions and behaviors. Marketing strategies should appeal to consumers’ emotional responses, address cognitive concerns, and highlight the specifc benefts of sustainable packaging. This research emphasizes the relevance of bioplastic packaging for organic products and underscores the signifcance of emotions in infuencing consumer behavior.

Eco-packaging in organic foods: rational decisions or emotional influences? / Lombardi, Alessia; Califano, Giovanbattista; Caracciolo, Francesco; DEL GIUDICE, Teresa; Cembalo, Luigi. - In: ORGANIC AGRICULTURE. - ISSN 1879-4246. - (2023), pp. 1-18. [10.1007/s13165-023-00442-5]

Eco-packaging in organic foods: rational decisions or emotional influences?

Lombardi Alessia;Giovanbattista Califano
;
Francesco Caracciolo;Teresa Del Giudice;Luigi Cembalo
2023

Abstract

The introduction of biodegradable and compostable packaging has been a signifcant milestone in reducing conventional plastic use, particularly in sectors that prioritize sustainability like the organic food industry. This study explores the factors infuencing the selection of such packaging, with a specifc focus on the role of emotions in a representative sample of Italian consumers. Two models, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Rational-Emotional Model (REM), were evaluated and compared. The TPB model confrms that positive attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control infuence the intention to choose biodegradable and compostable packaging. The REM reveals that environmental concern, cognitive benefts, and emotions signifcantly impact purchase intentions. The REM explains a greater variance in intention compared to the TPB model, highlighting the importance of combining rational and emotional components. Biodegradable and compostable packaging aligns well with the target consumers of organic food, making it an excellent solution for organic produce. Emotions play a crucial role in shaping consumer intentions and behaviors. Marketing strategies should appeal to consumers’ emotional responses, address cognitive concerns, and highlight the specifc benefts of sustainable packaging. This research emphasizes the relevance of bioplastic packaging for organic products and underscores the signifcance of emotions in infuencing consumer behavior.
2023
Eco-packaging in organic foods: rational decisions or emotional influences? / Lombardi, Alessia; Califano, Giovanbattista; Caracciolo, Francesco; DEL GIUDICE, Teresa; Cembalo, Luigi. - In: ORGANIC AGRICULTURE. - ISSN 1879-4246. - (2023), pp. 1-18. [10.1007/s13165-023-00442-5]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13165-023-00442-5.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 912.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
912.06 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/943263
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact