Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Six Sigma (SS) have largely proved their reliability in the healthcare context. The former focuses on the assessment of health technologies to be introduced in a healthcare system. The latter deals with the improvement of the quality of services, reducing errors and variability in the healthcare processes. Both the approaches demand a detailed analysis, evidence-based decisions, and efficient control plans. In this paper, the SS is applied as a support tool for HTA of two antibiotics with the final aim of assessing their clinical and organizational impact in terms of postoperative Length Of Stay (LOS) for patients undergoing tongue cancer surgery. More specifically, the SS has been implemented through its main tool, namely the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) cycle. Moreover, within the DMAIC cycle, a modelling approach based on a multiple linear regression analysis technique is introduced, in the Control phase, to add complementary information and confirm the results obtained by the statistical analysis performed within the other phases of the SS DMAIC. The obtained results show that the proposed methodology is effective to determine the clinical and organizational impact of each of the examined antibiotics, when LOS is taken as a measure of performance, and guide the decision-making process. Furthermore, our study provides a systematic procedure which, properly combining different and well-assessed tools available in the literature, demonstrated to be a useful guidance for choosing the right treatment based on the available data in the specific circumstance.

A six sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for health technology assessment of two antibiotics / Ponsiglione, A. M.; Ricciardi, C.; Improta, G.; Dell'Aversana Orabona, G.; Sorrentino, A.; Amato, F.; Romano, M.. - In: MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1547-1063. - 18:4(2021), pp. 3469-3490. [10.3934/MBE.2021174]

A six sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for health technology assessment of two antibiotics

Ponsiglione A. M.;Ricciardi C.;Improta G.;Dell'Aversana Orabona G.;Sorrentino A.;Amato F.;Romano M.
2021

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Six Sigma (SS) have largely proved their reliability in the healthcare context. The former focuses on the assessment of health technologies to be introduced in a healthcare system. The latter deals with the improvement of the quality of services, reducing errors and variability in the healthcare processes. Both the approaches demand a detailed analysis, evidence-based decisions, and efficient control plans. In this paper, the SS is applied as a support tool for HTA of two antibiotics with the final aim of assessing their clinical and organizational impact in terms of postoperative Length Of Stay (LOS) for patients undergoing tongue cancer surgery. More specifically, the SS has been implemented through its main tool, namely the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) cycle. Moreover, within the DMAIC cycle, a modelling approach based on a multiple linear regression analysis technique is introduced, in the Control phase, to add complementary information and confirm the results obtained by the statistical analysis performed within the other phases of the SS DMAIC. The obtained results show that the proposed methodology is effective to determine the clinical and organizational impact of each of the examined antibiotics, when LOS is taken as a measure of performance, and guide the decision-making process. Furthermore, our study provides a systematic procedure which, properly combining different and well-assessed tools available in the literature, demonstrated to be a useful guidance for choosing the right treatment based on the available data in the specific circumstance.
2021
A six sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for health technology assessment of two antibiotics / Ponsiglione, A. M.; Ricciardi, C.; Improta, G.; Dell'Aversana Orabona, G.; Sorrentino, A.; Amato, F.; Romano, M.. - In: MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1547-1063. - 18:4(2021), pp. 3469-3490. [10.3934/MBE.2021174]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.3934_mbe.2021174.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 672.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
672.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
supplements.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary material
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 666.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
666.67 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/853401
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact