Agricultural intensification is central to the modernization narrative, promoting efficiency and productivity, particularly in the dairy sector. Despite potential efficiency gains, intensive farming faces criticism for its environmental impact, particularly concerning greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient runoff, raising concerns about their long-term environmental sustainability. This study empirically investigates the interplay of farm intensification, environmental sustainability, and economic efficiency in the livestock sector. It uniquely analyses how intensification and environmental performance, the latter measured by the Agri-Environmental Footprint Index, influence the technical efficiency of buffalo dairy farms. To this end, this research employs the Stochastic Frontier Analysis to a sample of 198 buffalo farms within Italy’s Protected Designation of Origin area, using the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) for the period 2010 to 2022. Results highlighted that the adoption of intensive practices in buffalo farming represents a winning solution from the standpoint of technical efficiency, while acting sustainably does not pay off from a technical and economic point of view. These results stimulate reflections on the effectiveness of policies supporting livestock farms, offering insights for both practitioners and policymakers to improve agricultural practices while maintaining economic viability.

Intensive vs. environmentally sustainable: The livestock dilemma / Lombardi, Alessia; Bifulco, Giovanna; Campanile, Giuseppe; Neglia, Gianluca; Piscopo, Nadia; Paparella, Antonio; Cembalo, Luigi. - In: LIVESTOCK SCIENCE. - ISSN 1871-1413. - 300:105789(2025), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105789]

Intensive vs. environmentally sustainable: The livestock dilemma

Alessia Lombardi;Giovanna Bifulco;Giuseppe Campanile;Gianluca Neglia;Nadia Piscopo;Antonio Paparella
;
Luigi Cembalo
2025

Abstract

Agricultural intensification is central to the modernization narrative, promoting efficiency and productivity, particularly in the dairy sector. Despite potential efficiency gains, intensive farming faces criticism for its environmental impact, particularly concerning greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient runoff, raising concerns about their long-term environmental sustainability. This study empirically investigates the interplay of farm intensification, environmental sustainability, and economic efficiency in the livestock sector. It uniquely analyses how intensification and environmental performance, the latter measured by the Agri-Environmental Footprint Index, influence the technical efficiency of buffalo dairy farms. To this end, this research employs the Stochastic Frontier Analysis to a sample of 198 buffalo farms within Italy’s Protected Designation of Origin area, using the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) for the period 2010 to 2022. Results highlighted that the adoption of intensive practices in buffalo farming represents a winning solution from the standpoint of technical efficiency, while acting sustainably does not pay off from a technical and economic point of view. These results stimulate reflections on the effectiveness of policies supporting livestock farms, offering insights for both practitioners and policymakers to improve agricultural practices while maintaining economic viability.
2025
Intensive vs. environmentally sustainable: The livestock dilemma / Lombardi, Alessia; Bifulco, Giovanna; Campanile, Giuseppe; Neglia, Gianluca; Piscopo, Nadia; Paparella, Antonio; Cembalo, Luigi. - In: LIVESTOCK SCIENCE. - ISSN 1871-1413. - 300:105789(2025), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105789]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lombardi et al. Livestock Science 2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.45 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.45 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1016312
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact