Is the Cartesian subject the foundation that ensures the entity by making it certain, as Heidegger would have it? Or is it a foundation only as a creative and productive activity, as Sartre suggests? Or, then again, is it a chiasm, a relationship, a view that Merleau-Ponty seems to favour? By directing their gaze towards the different facets of what Paul Valery had defined as “Descartes’ plurality”, Heidegger, Sartre and Merleau-Ponty would arrive, starting from the Second World War, at a conception of action as the bringing to completion of the relationship of being to man, as an active transformation of reality, or as the immersion of oneself in the complex plots of the world.
La pluralità di Cartesio. Su soggettività e politica nel secondo dopoguerra: Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, / Ruoppo, ANNA PIA. - (2024), pp. 187-206.
La pluralità di Cartesio. Su soggettività e politica nel secondo dopoguerra: Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty,
Ruoppo
2024
Abstract
Is the Cartesian subject the foundation that ensures the entity by making it certain, as Heidegger would have it? Or is it a foundation only as a creative and productive activity, as Sartre suggests? Or, then again, is it a chiasm, a relationship, a view that Merleau-Ponty seems to favour? By directing their gaze towards the different facets of what Paul Valery had defined as “Descartes’ plurality”, Heidegger, Sartre and Merleau-Ponty would arrive, starting from the Second World War, at a conception of action as the bringing to completion of the relationship of being to man, as an active transformation of reality, or as the immersion of oneself in the complex plots of the world.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


