Background and purpose: Susceptibility estimates derived from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images for the cerebral cortex and major subcortical structures are variably reported in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, as average of all ((Formula presented.)), absolute ((Formula presented.)), or positive- ((Formula presented.)) and negative-only ((Formula presented.)) susceptibility values using a region of interest (ROI) approach. This pilot study presents a reliability analysis of currently used ROI-QSM metrics and an alternative ROI-based approach to obtain voxel-weighted ROI-QSM metrics ((Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.)). Methods: Ten healthy subjects underwent repeated (test-retest) 3-dimensional multi-echo gradient-echo (3DMEGE) 3 Tesla MRI measurements. Complex-valued 3DMEGE images were acquired and reconstructed with slice thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm (3DMEGE1, 3DMEGE2) along with 3DT1-weighted isometric (voxel 1 mm3) images for independent registration and ROI segmentation. Agreement, consistency, and reproducibility of ROI-QSM metrics were assessed through Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient, and interscan and intersubject coefficient of variation (CoV). Results: All ROI-QSM metrics exhibited good to excellent consistency and test-retest agreement with no proportional bias. Interscan CoV was higher for (Formula presented.) in comparison to the other metrics where it was below 15%, in both 3DMEGE1 and 3DMEGE2 datasets. Intersubject CoV for (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) exceeded 50% in all ROIs. Conclusions: Among the evaluated ROI-QSM metrics, (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) estimates were less reliable, whereas separating positive and negative values (using (Formula presented.)) improved the reproducibility within, and the comparability between, subjects, even when reducing the slice thickness. These preliminary findings may offer valuable insights toward standardizing ROI-QSM metrics across different patient cohorts and imaging settings in future clinical MRI studies. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Neuroimaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Neuroimaging.

Reliability of quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging metrics for cerebral cortex and major subcortical structures / Pirozzi, Maria Agnese; Canna, Antonietta; Nardo, Federica Di; Sansone, Mario; Trojsi, Francesca; Cirillo, Mario; Esposito, Fabrizio. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING. - ISSN 1051-2284. - 34:6(2024), pp. 720-731. [10.1111/jon.13234]

Reliability of quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging metrics for cerebral cortex and major subcortical structures

Sansone, Mario
Conceptualization
;
2024

Abstract

Background and purpose: Susceptibility estimates derived from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) images for the cerebral cortex and major subcortical structures are variably reported in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, as average of all ((Formula presented.)), absolute ((Formula presented.)), or positive- ((Formula presented.)) and negative-only ((Formula presented.)) susceptibility values using a region of interest (ROI) approach. This pilot study presents a reliability analysis of currently used ROI-QSM metrics and an alternative ROI-based approach to obtain voxel-weighted ROI-QSM metrics ((Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.)). Methods: Ten healthy subjects underwent repeated (test-retest) 3-dimensional multi-echo gradient-echo (3DMEGE) 3 Tesla MRI measurements. Complex-valued 3DMEGE images were acquired and reconstructed with slice thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm (3DMEGE1, 3DMEGE2) along with 3DT1-weighted isometric (voxel 1 mm3) images for independent registration and ROI segmentation. Agreement, consistency, and reproducibility of ROI-QSM metrics were assessed through Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient, and interscan and intersubject coefficient of variation (CoV). Results: All ROI-QSM metrics exhibited good to excellent consistency and test-retest agreement with no proportional bias. Interscan CoV was higher for (Formula presented.) in comparison to the other metrics where it was below 15%, in both 3DMEGE1 and 3DMEGE2 datasets. Intersubject CoV for (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) exceeded 50% in all ROIs. Conclusions: Among the evaluated ROI-QSM metrics, (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) estimates were less reliable, whereas separating positive and negative values (using (Formula presented.)) improved the reproducibility within, and the comparability between, subjects, even when reducing the slice thickness. These preliminary findings may offer valuable insights toward standardizing ROI-QSM metrics across different patient cohorts and imaging settings in future clinical MRI studies. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Neuroimaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Neuroimaging.
2024
Reliability of quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging metrics for cerebral cortex and major subcortical structures / Pirozzi, Maria Agnese; Canna, Antonietta; Nardo, Federica Di; Sansone, Mario; Trojsi, Francesca; Cirillo, Mario; Esposito, Fabrizio. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING. - ISSN 1051-2284. - 34:6(2024), pp. 720-731. [10.1111/jon.13234]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024-Journal of Neuroimaging - 2024 - Pirozzi - Reliability of quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging metrics for cerebral.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 2.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/988646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact