This article investigates two well-known and highly debated issues of Romance morpho-syntax, existential constructions with HAVE and pleonastic uses of reflexives (i.e., pleonastic SE) with one-argument verbs, as instantiated in some southern Italo-Romance varieties, in relation to their Latin antecedents. It is demonstrated (i) that existential HAVE in Romance continues and further develops patterns which became available in Late Latin to ‘introduce a new entity or situation into the world of discourse’ within a spatio-temporal frame and results from paths of change reflecting the existential uses of the Latin verb habere ‘have, hold’, rather than being related to an original possession scheme, i.e., to the transitive verb of possession habere, as usually assumed in the literature, and (ii) that pleonastic SE with one-argument verbs in some southern Italo-Romance varieties functions as a split intransitivity marker, continuing a Late Latin usage surfacing also in other Romance languages (e.g., French, Spanish and Romanian), albeit to a different extent.

Excavating Language: Linguistic Connections across Latin, Greek, and Modern European Languages / Cennamo, M.. - (2026), pp. 1-22.

Excavating Language: Linguistic Connections across Latin, Greek, and Modern European Languages

Cennamo, Michela
2026

Abstract

This article investigates two well-known and highly debated issues of Romance morpho-syntax, existential constructions with HAVE and pleonastic uses of reflexives (i.e., pleonastic SE) with one-argument verbs, as instantiated in some southern Italo-Romance varieties, in relation to their Latin antecedents. It is demonstrated (i) that existential HAVE in Romance continues and further develops patterns which became available in Late Latin to ‘introduce a new entity or situation into the world of discourse’ within a spatio-temporal frame and results from paths of change reflecting the existential uses of the Latin verb habere ‘have, hold’, rather than being related to an original possession scheme, i.e., to the transitive verb of possession habere, as usually assumed in the literature, and (ii) that pleonastic SE with one-argument verbs in some southern Italo-Romance varieties functions as a split intransitivity marker, continuing a Late Latin usage surfacing also in other Romance languages (e.g., French, Spanish and Romanian), albeit to a different extent.
2026
Excavating Language: Linguistic Connections across Latin, Greek, and Modern European Languages / Cennamo, M.. - (2026), pp. 1-22.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/961305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact