Objective: To assess the quality content of YouTube™ videos on telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: First, the frequency of worldwide YouTube™ and Google™ searches for telemedicine was analyzed. Second, we queried YouTube™ with telemedicine-related terms. Third, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT A/V), the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Misinformation tool were used for the quality assessment. Results: According to selection criteria, 129 videos were collected for the analysis. From January 2018 to January 2022, the peak relative interest on YouTube™ and Google™ occurred in March 2020. Of all, 27.1 and 72.9% were uploaded before (Jan 2018-Feb 2020) and after (Mar 2020-Mar 2022) the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. According to the PEMAT A/V, the overall median understandability and actionability was 50.0% (33.3 [IQR 0-66.7] vs 50.0 [27.1-75], p = 0.2) and 66.7% (63.6 [IQR 50.0-75.7] vs 67.9 [50.0-79.2],p = 0.6), respectively. According to GQS, 3.9%, 17.8%, 24.0%, 26.4% and 27.9% were classified as excellent, good, medium, generally poor, and poor-quality videos, respectively. The highest rate of poor-quality videos was recorded in videos uploaded before COVID-19 pandemic (37.1 vs 24.5%). According to overall misinformation score, a higher score was recorded for the videos uploaded after COVID-19 pandemic (1.8 [IQR 1.4-2.3] vs 2.2 [1.8-2.8], p = 0.01). Conclusions: The interest in telemedicine showed a significant peak when the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. However, the contents provided on YouTubeTM were not informative enough. In the future, official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.

Telemedicine and YouTube™: Video quality analysis before and after COVID-19 pandemic / Mirone, Vincenzo; Abate, Marco; Fusco, Giovanni Maria; Cirillo, Luigi; Napolitano, Luigi; Morra, Simone; Di Bello, Francesco; Califano, Gianluigi; Mirone, Claudia; La Rocca, Roberto; Creta, Massimiliano; Celentano, Giuseppe; Capece, Marco; Mangiapia, Francesco; Longo, Nicola; Collà Ruvolo, Claudia. - In: ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA ANDROLOGIA. - ISSN 2282-4197. - (2023), p. 11341. [10.4081/aiua.2023.11341]

Telemedicine and YouTube™: Video quality analysis before and after COVID-19 pandemic

Mirone, Vincenzo;Abate, Marco;Fusco, Giovanni Maria;Cirillo, Luigi;Morra, Simone;Di Bello, Francesco;Califano, Gianluigi;La Rocca, Roberto;Creta, Massimiliano;Capece, Marco;Mangiapia, Francesco;Longo, Nicola;
2023

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality content of YouTube™ videos on telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: First, the frequency of worldwide YouTube™ and Google™ searches for telemedicine was analyzed. Second, we queried YouTube™ with telemedicine-related terms. Third, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT A/V), the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Misinformation tool were used for the quality assessment. Results: According to selection criteria, 129 videos were collected for the analysis. From January 2018 to January 2022, the peak relative interest on YouTube™ and Google™ occurred in March 2020. Of all, 27.1 and 72.9% were uploaded before (Jan 2018-Feb 2020) and after (Mar 2020-Mar 2022) the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. According to the PEMAT A/V, the overall median understandability and actionability was 50.0% (33.3 [IQR 0-66.7] vs 50.0 [27.1-75], p = 0.2) and 66.7% (63.6 [IQR 50.0-75.7] vs 67.9 [50.0-79.2],p = 0.6), respectively. According to GQS, 3.9%, 17.8%, 24.0%, 26.4% and 27.9% were classified as excellent, good, medium, generally poor, and poor-quality videos, respectively. The highest rate of poor-quality videos was recorded in videos uploaded before COVID-19 pandemic (37.1 vs 24.5%). According to overall misinformation score, a higher score was recorded for the videos uploaded after COVID-19 pandemic (1.8 [IQR 1.4-2.3] vs 2.2 [1.8-2.8], p = 0.01). Conclusions: The interest in telemedicine showed a significant peak when the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. However, the contents provided on YouTubeTM were not informative enough. In the future, official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.
2023
Telemedicine and YouTube™: Video quality analysis before and after COVID-19 pandemic / Mirone, Vincenzo; Abate, Marco; Fusco, Giovanni Maria; Cirillo, Luigi; Napolitano, Luigi; Morra, Simone; Di Bello, Francesco; Califano, Gianluigi; Mirone, Claudia; La Rocca, Roberto; Creta, Massimiliano; Celentano, Giuseppe; Capece, Marco; Mangiapia, Francesco; Longo, Nicola; Collà Ruvolo, Claudia. - In: ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA ANDROLOGIA. - ISSN 2282-4197. - (2023), p. 11341. [10.4081/aiua.2023.11341]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/922885
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact