With regard to the gem once preserved at the Berlin museums and currently lost, depicting a crucified figure with the inscription ΟΡΦΕΟΣ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟΣ (Furtwängler 1896, no. 8830), this article aims at demonstrating that: 1) the depiction of the crucified man is probably the work of a modern carver, 2) the inscription ΟΡΦΕΟΣ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟΣ is most likely a copy of an ancient epigraph (which occurs not surprisingly on other ancient gems without any depiction), as can be proved by both a philological and a paleographic analysis. The carver probably acted on commission from a member of the Roman élite (perhaps in the 18th century), to whom the association between Orpheus and Christ must have had a precise cultural-ideological significance. In its final part, the article recalls some of Lupieri’s remarks on Reception History, which support the iconographic analysis as a successful method in the resumption and/or reformulation of earlier representational models.

Il crocifisso “orfico-bacchico”. Ancora sull’antichità della gemma di Berlino (Furtwängler 1896, no. 8830) / Arcari, Luca. - 35:(2022), pp. 189-198.

Il crocifisso “orfico-bacchico”. Ancora sull’antichità della gemma di Berlino (Furtwängler 1896, no. 8830)

Luca Arcari
2022

Abstract

With regard to the gem once preserved at the Berlin museums and currently lost, depicting a crucified figure with the inscription ΟΡΦΕΟΣ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟΣ (Furtwängler 1896, no. 8830), this article aims at demonstrating that: 1) the depiction of the crucified man is probably the work of a modern carver, 2) the inscription ΟΡΦΕΟΣ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟΣ is most likely a copy of an ancient epigraph (which occurs not surprisingly on other ancient gems without any depiction), as can be proved by both a philological and a paleographic analysis. The carver probably acted on commission from a member of the Roman élite (perhaps in the 18th century), to whom the association between Orpheus and Christ must have had a precise cultural-ideological significance. In its final part, the article recalls some of Lupieri’s remarks on Reception History, which support the iconographic analysis as a successful method in the resumption and/or reformulation of earlier representational models.
2022
979-12-5995-015-4
Il crocifisso “orfico-bacchico”. Ancora sull’antichità della gemma di Berlino (Furtwängler 1896, no. 8830) / Arcari, Luca. - 35:(2022), pp. 189-198.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Arcari (4).pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 456.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
456.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/917701
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact