Background: The assessment of body composition is central in evaluating athletes' nutritional status and the effects of training. The aim of this study was to evaluate body composition and the relation between bioimpedance phase angle (PhA) and muscular strength in elite female volleyball players. Methods: Twelve volleyball players (age 23.8±3.6 years; weight 63.0±5.1 kg; height 170±4 cm; BMI 21.9±1.3 kg/m2) and 22 non-athletic females, who served as a control group (age 23.6±2.0 years; weight 60.7±4.8 kg; height 167±5 cm; BMI 21.9±1.3 kg/m2), participating in the study. Skinfold thickness measures were used and segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed. Additionally, hand grip strength was used to evaluate muscular strength. Results: Volleyball players had lower FM and higher FFM than controls (FM(kg)=15.7±2.7 vs. 18.0±3.0, P=0.036; FM(%)=24.8±3.0 vs. 29.5±3.8, P=0.001; FFM(kg)=47.4±3.5 vs. 42.8±3.6, P=0.001). Both whole-body and segmental PhA were higher in volleyball players (P<0.05) than in controls, whereas no differences were observed for hand grip strength. A positive relation was found between hand grip strength and whole-body and upper limbs PhA in all subjects, resulting stronger in volleyball players (r=0.696, P=0.012 and r=0.821, P=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The data confirmed that body composition differed between volleyball players and non-athletic subjects. In addition, a strong correlation between PhA and hand grip strength in both volleyball players and in controls was found. However, further evaluations are needed to investigate the use of hand grip strength in sport performance.

Body composition, segmental bioimpedance phase angle and muscular strength in professional volleyball players compared to a control group

Olivia Di Vincenzo
Primo
;
Maurizio Marra
Secondo
;
Rosa Sammarco;Enza Speranza;Iolanda Cioffi;Luca Scalfi
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Background: The assessment of body composition is central in evaluating athletes' nutritional status and the effects of training. The aim of this study was to evaluate body composition and the relation between bioimpedance phase angle (PhA) and muscular strength in elite female volleyball players. Methods: Twelve volleyball players (age 23.8±3.6 years; weight 63.0±5.1 kg; height 170±4 cm; BMI 21.9±1.3 kg/m2) and 22 non-athletic females, who served as a control group (age 23.6±2.0 years; weight 60.7±4.8 kg; height 167±5 cm; BMI 21.9±1.3 kg/m2), participating in the study. Skinfold thickness measures were used and segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed. Additionally, hand grip strength was used to evaluate muscular strength. Results: Volleyball players had lower FM and higher FFM than controls (FM(kg)=15.7±2.7 vs. 18.0±3.0, P=0.036; FM(%)=24.8±3.0 vs. 29.5±3.8, P=0.001; FFM(kg)=47.4±3.5 vs. 42.8±3.6, P=0.001). Both whole-body and segmental PhA were higher in volleyball players (P<0.05) than in controls, whereas no differences were observed for hand grip strength. A positive relation was found between hand grip strength and whole-body and upper limbs PhA in all subjects, resulting stronger in volleyball players (r=0.696, P=0.012 and r=0.821, P=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The data confirmed that body composition differed between volleyball players and non-athletic subjects. In addition, a strong correlation between PhA and hand grip strength in both volleyball players and in controls was found. However, further evaluations are needed to investigate the use of hand grip strength in sport performance.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DI VINCENZO, Body composition volleyball players, JSportsMedPhysFItness 2020.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 2.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.86 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11588/890723
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact