Torment and Acceptance. Henry’s Violent Reading of Nietzsche This paper tries to analyze and highlight some of the emblematic tangles of the Nietzsche’s reading made by Michel Henry starting from his phénoménologie de la vie. By moving, in a clear and decisive way, towards the phenomenology of Husserl and Heidegger, in particular regarding the temporality matter, the French philosopher put himself in an hermeneutic condition that is at least problematic, not to say ambiguous, with Nietzsche who thinks about life issue concerning his concept of Wille zur Macht. Drawing attention on certain key words such as life, death, becoming, representation, immanence, very important for both the philosophers, present analysis wants to highlight some incongruities that necessarily come out in the Henry’s reading, on a side, and, on the other hand, wants to clarify how the French philosopher has repeatedly shown himself related (perhaps by misrepresenting the original) with the Nietzsche thought.
Lo strazio e l'accoglienza. La violenta lettura henryana di Nietzsche / Papparo, FELICE CIRO. - In: AZIMUTH. - ISSN 2282-4863. - VI (2018):11(2018), pp. 77-89.
Lo strazio e l'accoglienza. La violenta lettura henryana di Nietzsche
Papparo Felice Ciro
2018
Abstract
Torment and Acceptance. Henry’s Violent Reading of Nietzsche This paper tries to analyze and highlight some of the emblematic tangles of the Nietzsche’s reading made by Michel Henry starting from his phénoménologie de la vie. By moving, in a clear and decisive way, towards the phenomenology of Husserl and Heidegger, in particular regarding the temporality matter, the French philosopher put himself in an hermeneutic condition that is at least problematic, not to say ambiguous, with Nietzsche who thinks about life issue concerning his concept of Wille zur Macht. Drawing attention on certain key words such as life, death, becoming, representation, immanence, very important for both the philosophers, present analysis wants to highlight some incongruities that necessarily come out in the Henry’s reading, on a side, and, on the other hand, wants to clarify how the French philosopher has repeatedly shown himself related (perhaps by misrepresenting the original) with the Nietzsche thought.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AZi_011_FP04.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo in rivista
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
1.53 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
AZi_011_FP04.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
1.53 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.53 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.