Is it possible to think hegemonic design as a form of what Michel Foucault defined as “governmentality”? In which different modes would this “governmental’ character of design manifest itself? Which strategies and tactics could be employed to put it into question, from a critical point of view? Our contribution tries to shed light upon this issue from three manifestly different perspectives.

Design, Aesthetics and Biopolitics / Rispoli, Ernesto Ramon; Jordana Lluch, Ester; Guayabero, Oscar. - (2016). (Intervento presentato al convegno International Workshop on Higher Education tenutosi a Universidad de Vic (Spagna) nel 16 giugno 2016).

Design, Aesthetics and Biopolitics

Rispoli, Ernesto Ramon
;
2016

Abstract

Is it possible to think hegemonic design as a form of what Michel Foucault defined as “governmentality”? In which different modes would this “governmental’ character of design manifest itself? Which strategies and tactics could be employed to put it into question, from a critical point of view? Our contribution tries to shed light upon this issue from three manifestly different perspectives.
2016
Design, Aesthetics and Biopolitics / Rispoli, Ernesto Ramon; Jordana Lluch, Ester; Guayabero, Oscar. - (2016). (Intervento presentato al convegno International Workshop on Higher Education tenutosi a Universidad de Vic (Spagna) nel 16 giugno 2016).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/819246
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact