The subject of this paper is the distinction, so important, between “science” and “technique” in Law, in the thought of François Gény. This distinction, after all, has no other purpose, other than to free the science of Law from its false logic, unmasking its catatt of relative legal technique. Gény’s thought is critic of the conservatorism of traditional legal thought, whose concepts begin to prove fallacious in the light of a pragmatist approach. Inside the French sociologist legal theory, born a tension and a doctrinal conflict, between realist and solidariste currents and pragmatist currents

Dato e costruito nel diritto: l'apporto di François Gény

Vincenzo Rapone
2019

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the distinction, so important, between “science” and “technique” in Law, in the thought of François Gény. This distinction, after all, has no other purpose, other than to free the science of Law from its false logic, unmasking its catatt of relative legal technique. Gény’s thought is critic of the conservatorism of traditional legal thought, whose concepts begin to prove fallacious in the light of a pragmatist approach. Inside the French sociologist legal theory, born a tension and a doctrinal conflict, between realist and solidariste currents and pragmatist currents
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Solidarietà fondamentale.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11588/782523
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact