The subject of this paper is the distinction, so important, between “science” and “technique” in Law, in the thought of François Gény. This distinction, after all, has no other purpose, other than to free the science of Law from its false logic, unmasking its catatt of relative legal technique. Gény’s thought is critic of the conservatorism of traditional legal thought, whose concepts begin to prove fallacious in the light of a pragmatist approach. Inside the French sociologist legal theory, born a tension and a doctrinal conflict, between realist and solidariste currents and pragmatist currents
Dato e costruito nel diritto: l'apporto di François Gény
Vincenzo Rapone
2019
Abstract
The subject of this paper is the distinction, so important, between “science” and “technique” in Law, in the thought of François Gény. This distinction, after all, has no other purpose, other than to free the science of Law from its false logic, unmasking its catatt of relative legal technique. Gény’s thought is critic of the conservatorism of traditional legal thought, whose concepts begin to prove fallacious in the light of a pragmatist approach. Inside the French sociologist legal theory, born a tension and a doctrinal conflict, between realist and solidariste currents and pragmatist currentsFile in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Solidarietà fondamentale.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
2.15 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.