In this paper, we analyze the impact of post-innovation knowledge spillovers on firms' decisions to invest and cooperate in R&D, forming a research joint venture (RJV). In particular, we study the case of two potential investors involved in a non-tournament stochastic competition for developing a new product, in a market where imitation is possible. We propose a theoretical model where cooperation may emerge as a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of a three-stage game. In the first stage, firms decide whether to cooperate or not; in the second, they decide whether to invest or not; and in the third, they compete. We show that firms cooperate in R&D when the spillovers are high enough and the fixed costs associated with R&D activities are low enough; however, our analysis suggests that forming an RJV may not always be optimal, and therefore, subsidizing R&D cooperation may not be efficient. We propose an optimal scheme of subsidies, which should be designed according to the intensity of the spillovers, the level of the R&D costs, and the probability of innovation success. Finally, we show that in the case of mergers the private incentive to invest is maximized, and firms may not need public subsidies to cooperate. When subsidies are costly, not hindering mergers may be the second-best solution.
Spillovers, Product Innovation and R&D Cooperation: a Theoretical Model / Capuano, Carlo. - (2018). (Intervento presentato al convegno 45th EARIE Annual Conference European Association for Research in Industrial Economics tenutosi a Athens (Greece) nel 31 agosto - 2 settembre).
Spillovers, Product Innovation and R&D Cooperation: a Theoretical Model
carlo capuano
2018
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the impact of post-innovation knowledge spillovers on firms' decisions to invest and cooperate in R&D, forming a research joint venture (RJV). In particular, we study the case of two potential investors involved in a non-tournament stochastic competition for developing a new product, in a market where imitation is possible. We propose a theoretical model where cooperation may emerge as a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of a three-stage game. In the first stage, firms decide whether to cooperate or not; in the second, they decide whether to invest or not; and in the third, they compete. We show that firms cooperate in R&D when the spillovers are high enough and the fixed costs associated with R&D activities are low enough; however, our analysis suggests that forming an RJV may not always be optimal, and therefore, subsidizing R&D cooperation may not be efficient. We propose an optimal scheme of subsidies, which should be designed according to the intensity of the spillovers, the level of the R&D costs, and the probability of innovation success. Finally, we show that in the case of mergers the private incentive to invest is maximized, and firms may not need public subsidies to cooperate. When subsidies are costly, not hindering mergers may be the second-best solution.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Spillover.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
346.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
346.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.