In past decades, magnetic surveying had become popular as one of the most effective techniques supporting archaeological prospecting. This is possible because the existence of susceptibility contrasts between the cover soil and several buried finds often causes detectable anomalies. More recently, great advances were made in signal enhancement and boundary analysis of potential field anomalies, thanks to methods allowing a suitable differentiation of the field without making the process unstable. New three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques provided an estimate of the magnetization distribution within the subsoil by means of highresolution images of the source distribution. Most of these methods are fast and reliable in the presence of shallow and compact sources, just as in the case of the sources usually occurring in archaeological prospecting. Nevertheless, great effort was spent by the scientific community to overcome serious problems causing low signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. This chapter provides a step-bystep description of technical solutions adopted to improve the quality of data and to perform a better interpretation of the magnetic anomalies usually associated to the presence of archaeological finds. To this end, a summary of case histories is illustrated giving a general framework of the latest progress in archaeo-magnetism.

Geomagnetometry for Archaeology / Fedi, Maurizio; Cella, F.; Florio, Giovanni; La Manna, M.; Paoletti, Valeria. - 16:(2017), pp. 203-230. [10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_10]

Geomagnetometry for Archaeology

FEDI, MAURIZIO;FLORIO, GIOVANNI;La Manna, M.;PAOLETTI, VALERIA
2017

Abstract

In past decades, magnetic surveying had become popular as one of the most effective techniques supporting archaeological prospecting. This is possible because the existence of susceptibility contrasts between the cover soil and several buried finds often causes detectable anomalies. More recently, great advances were made in signal enhancement and boundary analysis of potential field anomalies, thanks to methods allowing a suitable differentiation of the field without making the process unstable. New three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques provided an estimate of the magnetization distribution within the subsoil by means of highresolution images of the source distribution. Most of these methods are fast and reliable in the presence of shallow and compact sources, just as in the case of the sources usually occurring in archaeological prospecting. Nevertheless, great effort was spent by the scientific community to overcome serious problems causing low signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. This chapter provides a step-bystep description of technical solutions adopted to improve the quality of data and to perform a better interpretation of the magnetic anomalies usually associated to the presence of archaeological finds. To this end, a summary of case histories is illustrated giving a general framework of the latest progress in archaeo-magnetism.
2017
978-3-319-50516-9
Geomagnetometry for Archaeology / Fedi, Maurizio; Cella, F.; Florio, Giovanni; La Manna, M.; Paoletti, Valeria. - 16:(2017), pp. 203-230. [10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_10]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/697472
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact