To identify genetic causes of intellectual disability (ID), we screened a cohort of 986 individuals with moderate to severe ID for variants in 565 known or candidate ID-associated genes using targeted next-generation sequencing. Likely pathogenic rare variants were found in ∼11% of the cases (113 variants in 107/986 individuals: ∼8% of the individuals had a likely pathogenic loss-of-function [LoF] variant, whereas ∼3% had a known pathogenic missense variant). Variants in SETD5, ATRX, CUL4B, MECP2, and ARID1B were the most common causes of ID. This study assessed the value of sequencing a cohort of probands to provide a molecular diagnosis of ID, without the availability of DNA from both parents for de novo sequence analysis. This modeling is clinically relevant as 28% of all UK families with dependent children are single parent households. In conclusion, to diagnose patients with ID in the absence of parental DNA, we recommend investigation of all LoF variants in known genes that cause ID and assessment of a limited list of proven pathogenic missense variants in these genes. This will provide 11% additional diagnostic yield beyond the 10%-15% yield from array CGH alone.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability / Grozeva, Detelina; Carss, Keren; Spasic Boskovic, Olivera; Tejada, Maria Isabel; Gecz, Jozef; Shaw, Marie; Corbett, Mark; Haan, Eric; Thompson, Elizabeth; Friend, Kathryn; Hussain, Zaamin; Hackett, Anna; Field, Michael; Renieri, Alessandra; Stevenson, Roger; Schwartz, Charles; Floyd, James A. B.; Bentham, Jamie; Cosgrove, Catherine; Keavney, Bernard; Bhattacharya, Shoumo; Hurles, Matthew; Raymond, F. Lucy; Franco, Brunella. - In: HUMAN MUTATION. - ISSN 1059-7794. - 36:12(2015), pp. 1197-1204. [10.1002/humu.22901]

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability

FRANCO, BRUNELLA
2015

Abstract

To identify genetic causes of intellectual disability (ID), we screened a cohort of 986 individuals with moderate to severe ID for variants in 565 known or candidate ID-associated genes using targeted next-generation sequencing. Likely pathogenic rare variants were found in ∼11% of the cases (113 variants in 107/986 individuals: ∼8% of the individuals had a likely pathogenic loss-of-function [LoF] variant, whereas ∼3% had a known pathogenic missense variant). Variants in SETD5, ATRX, CUL4B, MECP2, and ARID1B were the most common causes of ID. This study assessed the value of sequencing a cohort of probands to provide a molecular diagnosis of ID, without the availability of DNA from both parents for de novo sequence analysis. This modeling is clinically relevant as 28% of all UK families with dependent children are single parent households. In conclusion, to diagnose patients with ID in the absence of parental DNA, we recommend investigation of all LoF variants in known genes that cause ID and assessment of a limited list of proven pathogenic missense variants in these genes. This will provide 11% additional diagnostic yield beyond the 10%-15% yield from array CGH alone.
2015
Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of 1,000 Individuals with Intellectual Disability / Grozeva, Detelina; Carss, Keren; Spasic Boskovic, Olivera; Tejada, Maria Isabel; Gecz, Jozef; Shaw, Marie; Corbett, Mark; Haan, Eric; Thompson, Elizabeth; Friend, Kathryn; Hussain, Zaamin; Hackett, Anna; Field, Michael; Renieri, Alessandra; Stevenson, Roger; Schwartz, Charles; Floyd, James A. B.; Bentham, Jamie; Cosgrove, Catherine; Keavney, Bernard; Bhattacharya, Shoumo; Hurles, Matthew; Raymond, F. Lucy; Franco, Brunella. - In: HUMAN MUTATION. - ISSN 1059-7794. - 36:12(2015), pp. 1197-1204. [10.1002/humu.22901]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/631826
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 142
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 134
social impact