PURPOSE: Experimental data suggest a complex cross-talk between HER-2 and estrogen receptor, and it has been hypothesized that HER-2-positive tumors may be less responsive to certain endocrine treatments. Clinical data, however, have been conflicting. We have conducted a meta-analysis on the interaction between the response to endocrine treatment and the overexpression of HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Studies have been identified by searching the Medline, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases. Selection criteria were (a) metastatic breast cancer, (b) endocrine therapy (any line of treatment), and (c) evaluation of HER-2 expression (any method). For each study, the relative risk for treatment failure for HER-2-positive over HER-2-negative patients with 95\% confidence interval was calculated as an estimate of the predictive effect of HER-2. Pooled estimates of the relative risk were computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 2,379 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relative risk was 1.42 (95\% confidence interval, 1.32-1.52; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.380). For studies involving tamoxifen, the pooled relative risk was 1.33 (95\% confidence interval, 1.20-1.48; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.97); for studies involving other hormonal drugs, a pooled relative risk of 1.49 (95\% confidence interval, 1.36-1.64; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.08) was estimated. A second meta-analysis limited to tumors that were either estrogen receptor positive, estrogen receptor unknown, or estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less responsive to any type of endocrine treatment. This effect holds in the subgroup of patients with positive or unknown steroid receptors..

A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer / DE LAURENTIIS, Michelino; Arpino, Grazia; Massarelli, E; Ruggiero, A; Carlomagno, C; Ciardiello, F; Tortora, Giampaolo; D'Agostino, D; Caputo, F; Cancello, G; Montagna, E; Malorni, L; Zinno, L; Lauria, Rossella; Bianco, ANGELO RAFFAELE; DE PLACIDO, Sabino. - In: CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1078-0432. - STAMPA. - 11:(2005), pp. 4741-4748.

A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer.

DE LAURENTIIS, MICHELINO;ARPINO, GRAZIA;TORTORA, GIAMPAOLO;LAURIA, ROSSELLA;BIANCO, ANGELO RAFFAELE;DE PLACIDO, SABINO
2005

Abstract

PURPOSE: Experimental data suggest a complex cross-talk between HER-2 and estrogen receptor, and it has been hypothesized that HER-2-positive tumors may be less responsive to certain endocrine treatments. Clinical data, however, have been conflicting. We have conducted a meta-analysis on the interaction between the response to endocrine treatment and the overexpression of HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Studies have been identified by searching the Medline, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases. Selection criteria were (a) metastatic breast cancer, (b) endocrine therapy (any line of treatment), and (c) evaluation of HER-2 expression (any method). For each study, the relative risk for treatment failure for HER-2-positive over HER-2-negative patients with 95\% confidence interval was calculated as an estimate of the predictive effect of HER-2. Pooled estimates of the relative risk were computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 2,379 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relative risk was 1.42 (95\% confidence interval, 1.32-1.52; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.380). For studies involving tamoxifen, the pooled relative risk was 1.33 (95\% confidence interval, 1.20-1.48; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.97); for studies involving other hormonal drugs, a pooled relative risk of 1.49 (95\% confidence interval, 1.36-1.64; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.08) was estimated. A second meta-analysis limited to tumors that were either estrogen receptor positive, estrogen receptor unknown, or estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less responsive to any type of endocrine treatment. This effect holds in the subgroup of patients with positive or unknown steroid receptors..
2005
A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer / DE LAURENTIIS, Michelino; Arpino, Grazia; Massarelli, E; Ruggiero, A; Carlomagno, C; Ciardiello, F; Tortora, Giampaolo; D'Agostino, D; Caputo, F; Cancello, G; Montagna, E; Malorni, L; Zinno, L; Lauria, Rossella; Bianco, ANGELO RAFFAELE; DE PLACIDO, Sabino. - In: CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 1078-0432. - STAMPA. - 11:(2005), pp. 4741-4748.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DeLaurentiis-ClinCancerRes2005.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 317.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
317.54 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/204149
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact