The paper closes with some noted criticisms on the need to consider the concept of group project in keeping with the theoretical perspective adopted. The present contribution is articulated into two sections. In the first (paragraph 2), the concept of Project Management (PM) is investigated by highlighting the presence of research trends that differ in their basic premises, analysis methodologies and study approaches. In addition to the more consolidated research trends an alternative literature also exists on the PM theme, which dwells severally on its critical state and on its potential hazards (Hodgson and Cicmil, 2006). In the second section (paragraphs 3 and 4), attention is directed towards the study of the concept of project group which is analyzed in its constitutive parts, with respect to the two possible interpretations of collectivity of practice and community of practice (Orr, 1990; Wenger, 1998; Lindkvist, 2005).
The interpretation of the project group between collectivity of practice and community of practice, / Mangia, Gianluigi; Canonico, Paolo; E., DE NITO. - ELETTRONICO. - (2007), pp. 1-20. (Intervento presentato al convegno Doing Well By Doing Good tenutosi a Philadelphia nel August 3-8,).
The interpretation of the project group between collectivity of practice and community of practice,
MANGIA, GIANLUIGI;CANONICO, PAOLO;
2007
Abstract
The paper closes with some noted criticisms on the need to consider the concept of group project in keeping with the theoretical perspective adopted. The present contribution is articulated into two sections. In the first (paragraph 2), the concept of Project Management (PM) is investigated by highlighting the presence of research trends that differ in their basic premises, analysis methodologies and study approaches. In addition to the more consolidated research trends an alternative literature also exists on the PM theme, which dwells severally on its critical state and on its potential hazards (Hodgson and Cicmil, 2006). In the second section (paragraphs 3 and 4), attention is directed towards the study of the concept of project group which is analyzed in its constitutive parts, with respect to the two possible interpretations of collectivity of practice and community of practice (Orr, 1990; Wenger, 1998; Lindkvist, 2005).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
