This study investigated psychosocial profiles of potential renewable energy community (REC) participants in Italy, examining how individual-level, community-level, and societal-level factors combine to shape participation intentions. Latent Profile Analysis identified distinct profiles among Italian citizens (N = 580) using 11 indicators: Pro-environmental Values, Civic Engagement, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, RECs acceptability (individual level); Sense of Community, Institutional Trust, Common Good Orientation, Sense of Responsible Togetherness (community level); and communication clarity (societal level). Three distinct profiles emerged: Civic-minded Interested (35.5%), Uncommitted (56.4%), and Private-minded Uninterested (8.1%). Counterintuitively, the Private-minded profile showed the highest stated participation intention (72.3%), followed by Civic-minded (67.0%) and Uncommitted (60.2%), though this overall pattern was non-significant (p = 0.110). No significant differences emerged across profiles in preferred level of engagement. Findings reveal the multilevel, ecological nature of REC participation while highlighting the distinction between stated intentions and the psychosocial resources that typically sustain actual engagement. Results underscore the need for differentiated engagement strategies and community capacity building tailored to distinct psychosocial configurations.

Community‐Based Projects for Energy Transition: Citizen Profiling Through Psychological and Social Drivers / De Simone, E., Rochira, A., Procentese, F., Gatti, F., Marano, B., D'Errico, F., Scardigno, R., Sportelli, C., Mannarini, T.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0090-4392. - 54:5(2026), pp. 1-15. [10.1002/jcop.70131]

Community‐Based Projects for Energy Transition: Citizen Profiling Through Psychological and Social Drivers

Procentese, Fortuna;Gatti, Flora;Marano, Biagio;
2026

Abstract

This study investigated psychosocial profiles of potential renewable energy community (REC) participants in Italy, examining how individual-level, community-level, and societal-level factors combine to shape participation intentions. Latent Profile Analysis identified distinct profiles among Italian citizens (N = 580) using 11 indicators: Pro-environmental Values, Civic Engagement, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, RECs acceptability (individual level); Sense of Community, Institutional Trust, Common Good Orientation, Sense of Responsible Togetherness (community level); and communication clarity (societal level). Three distinct profiles emerged: Civic-minded Interested (35.5%), Uncommitted (56.4%), and Private-minded Uninterested (8.1%). Counterintuitively, the Private-minded profile showed the highest stated participation intention (72.3%), followed by Civic-minded (67.0%) and Uncommitted (60.2%), though this overall pattern was non-significant (p = 0.110). No significant differences emerged across profiles in preferred level of engagement. Findings reveal the multilevel, ecological nature of REC participation while highlighting the distinction between stated intentions and the psychosocial resources that typically sustain actual engagement. Results underscore the need for differentiated engagement strategies and community capacity building tailored to distinct psychosocial configurations.
2026
Community‐Based Projects for Energy Transition: Citizen Profiling Through Psychological and Social Drivers / De Simone, E., Rochira, A., Procentese, F., Gatti, F., Marano, B., D'Errico, F., Scardigno, R., Sportelli, C., Mannarini, T.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0090-4392. - 54:5(2026), pp. 1-15. [10.1002/jcop.70131]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
De Simone et al 2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 995.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
995.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1060314
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact