Is it possible for neuroscience and dialectics to communicate? Can the concept of plasticity be used as the key to reinterpret Hegelian anthropology? Starting from Malabou’s work, this essay aims at developing the implications of the comparison between Hegel’s idea of “habit” and the current research on the brain, in order to show the richness of the plasticity paradigm, which not only allows us to make different domains of knowledge communicate, but also makes it possible to convey the complexity of nature as inherently marked by difference.
A plastic anthropology? Dialectic and Neuroscience in Catherine Malabou’s Thought / Pitillo, Federica. - (2022), pp. 51-61.
A plastic anthropology? Dialectic and Neuroscience in Catherine Malabou’s Thought
Federica Pitillo
2022
Abstract
Is it possible for neuroscience and dialectics to communicate? Can the concept of plasticity be used as the key to reinterpret Hegelian anthropology? Starting from Malabou’s work, this essay aims at developing the implications of the comparison between Hegel’s idea of “habit” and the current research on the brain, in order to show the richness of the plasticity paradigm, which not only allows us to make different domains of knowledge communicate, but also makes it possible to convey the complexity of nature as inherently marked by difference.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pitillo_Pubblicazione 5.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
211.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
211.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


