The paper deals with a thesis by Dipesh Chakrabarty on the climate of history. In this thesis, Chakrabarty discusses Vico, Croce, and historicism, arguing that the historicist view is incompatible with the interpretation of history that emerges in the current debate on the Anthropocene. The paper, which is a response to Chakrabarty’s arguments, attempts to provide a more comprehensive and complex view of historicism and Croce’s philosophy. In particular, it shows that Croce’s concepts of history and nature can correspond to some cases of contemporary philosophical and historical debate.

Croce e il clima della storia. Una risposta a Dipesh Chakrabarty / Peluso, R. - (2025), pp. 29-41.

Croce e il clima della storia. Una risposta a Dipesh Chakrabarty

Peluso, R
2025

Abstract

The paper deals with a thesis by Dipesh Chakrabarty on the climate of history. In this thesis, Chakrabarty discusses Vico, Croce, and historicism, arguing that the historicist view is incompatible with the interpretation of history that emerges in the current debate on the Anthropocene. The paper, which is a response to Chakrabarty’s arguments, attempts to provide a more comprehensive and complex view of historicism and Croce’s philosophy. In particular, it shows that Croce’s concepts of history and nature can correspond to some cases of contemporary philosophical and historical debate.
2025
Croce e il clima della storia. Una risposta a Dipesh Chakrabarty / Peluso, R. - (2025), pp. 29-41.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1001741
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact