The paper provides a comparison between two relevant classes of numerical discretizations for stiff and nonstiff problems. Such a comparison regards linearly implicit Jacobian-dependent Runge–Kutta methods and fully implicit Runge–Kutta methods based on Gauss–Legendre nodes, both A-stable. We show that Jacobian-dependent discretizations are more efficient than Jacobian-free fully implicit methods, as visible in the numerical evidence.
Jacobian-dependent vs Jacobian-free discretizations for nonlinear differential problems / Conte, Dajana; D'Ambrosio, Raffaele; Pagano, Giovanni; Paternoster, Beatrice. - In: COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS. - ISSN 1807-0302. - 39:3, 171(2020), pp. 1-12. [10.1007/s40314-020-01200-z]
Jacobian-dependent vs Jacobian-free discretizations for nonlinear differential problems
Conte Dajana;Pagano Giovanni;Paternoster Beatrice
2020
Abstract
The paper provides a comparison between two relevant classes of numerical discretizations for stiff and nonstiff problems. Such a comparison regards linearly implicit Jacobian-dependent Runge–Kutta methods and fully implicit Runge–Kutta methods based on Gauss–Legendre nodes, both A-stable. We show that Jacobian-dependent discretizations are more efficient than Jacobian-free fully implicit methods, as visible in the numerical evidence.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020 Jacobian-dependent vs Jacobian-free discretizations for nonlinear differential problems, Comput. Appl. Math. 39(3), 171 (2020).pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
253.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
253.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


