: Background/Objectives: This study assessed the proportion of secondary cardiovascular prevention patients who achieved low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets as per the 2019 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines. We also evaluated whether lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) were adjusted in patients not meeting targets and analyzed the likelihood of these modifications achieving recommended levels. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional observational study retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1909 outpatients in 9 Italian cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention clinics from January 2023 to June 2024. Inclusion criteria included prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and recent LDL-cholesterol levels. Data included demographics, ASCVD presentation, lipid profiles, and LLTs. Patients at very high risk had LDL targets of ≤55 mg/dL, or ≤40 mg/dL for recurrent events within 2 years. Clinicians' approaches to LLT modification in patients not at target were recorded, with LLT efficacy estimated based on percentage distance from LDL-cholesterol targets. Results: Of the 1909 patients, 41.3% met the LDL-cholesterol target. Predictors of achieving targets included male gender, cardiac rehabilitation, recent acute coronary syndrome, diabetes, and triple therapy (statin + ezetimibe + PCSK9 inhibitors). Conversely, a target of ≤40 mg/dL, lack of therapy, and monotherapy were negative predictors. Among 1074 patients not at target, LLT modifications were proposed for 48.6%. Predictors of LLT modification included recent ASCVD events, cardiac rehabilitation, and greater percentage distance from the LDL target, while advanced age and an LDL target of ≤40 mg/dL were negative predictors. However, only 42.3% of modified therapies were predicted to be effective in reaching LDL targets. Conclusions: Despite 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, a significant proportion of high-risk patients did not achieve LDL targets, and proposed LLT modifications were often insufficient. More intensive LLT regimens are needed to improve outcomes in this population.

Therapeutic Inertia in Dyslipidemia Management for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: Results from the Italian ITACARE-P Network / Faggiano, Andrea; Gualeni, Anna; Barbieri, Lucia; Mureddu, Gian Francesco; Venturini, Elio; Giallauria, Francesco; Ambrosetti, Marco; Ruzzolini, Matteo; Maranta, Francesco; Silverii, Maria Vittoria; Garau, Laura; Garamella, Davide; Napoli, Raffaele; Maresca, Luigi; Panetta, Gaetano Luca; Maggi, Antonio; Carugo, Stefano; Fattirolli, Francesco; Faggiano, Pompilio. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 14:2(2025), pp. 493-508. [10.3390/jcm14020493]

Therapeutic Inertia in Dyslipidemia Management for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: Results from the Italian ITACARE-P Network

Giallauria, Francesco;Napoli, Raffaele;
2025

Abstract

: Background/Objectives: This study assessed the proportion of secondary cardiovascular prevention patients who achieved low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol targets as per the 2019 ESC/EAS Dyslipidemia Guidelines. We also evaluated whether lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) were adjusted in patients not meeting targets and analyzed the likelihood of these modifications achieving recommended levels. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional observational study retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1909 outpatients in 9 Italian cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention clinics from January 2023 to June 2024. Inclusion criteria included prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and recent LDL-cholesterol levels. Data included demographics, ASCVD presentation, lipid profiles, and LLTs. Patients at very high risk had LDL targets of ≤55 mg/dL, or ≤40 mg/dL for recurrent events within 2 years. Clinicians' approaches to LLT modification in patients not at target were recorded, with LLT efficacy estimated based on percentage distance from LDL-cholesterol targets. Results: Of the 1909 patients, 41.3% met the LDL-cholesterol target. Predictors of achieving targets included male gender, cardiac rehabilitation, recent acute coronary syndrome, diabetes, and triple therapy (statin + ezetimibe + PCSK9 inhibitors). Conversely, a target of ≤40 mg/dL, lack of therapy, and monotherapy were negative predictors. Among 1074 patients not at target, LLT modifications were proposed for 48.6%. Predictors of LLT modification included recent ASCVD events, cardiac rehabilitation, and greater percentage distance from the LDL target, while advanced age and an LDL target of ≤40 mg/dL were negative predictors. However, only 42.3% of modified therapies were predicted to be effective in reaching LDL targets. Conclusions: Despite 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, a significant proportion of high-risk patients did not achieve LDL targets, and proposed LLT modifications were often insufficient. More intensive LLT regimens are needed to improve outcomes in this population.
2025
Therapeutic Inertia in Dyslipidemia Management for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention: Results from the Italian ITACARE-P Network / Faggiano, Andrea; Gualeni, Anna; Barbieri, Lucia; Mureddu, Gian Francesco; Venturini, Elio; Giallauria, Francesco; Ambrosetti, Marco; Ruzzolini, Matteo; Maranta, Francesco; Silverii, Maria Vittoria; Garau, Laura; Garamella, Davide; Napoli, Raffaele; Maresca, Luigi; Panetta, Gaetano Luca; Maggi, Antonio; Carugo, Stefano; Fattirolli, Francesco; Faggiano, Pompilio. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 14:2(2025), pp. 493-508. [10.3390/jcm14020493]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Therapeutic Inertia in Dyslipidemia Management for Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention_ Results from the Italian ITACARE-P Network.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: PDF PAPER
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 754.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
754.81 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/994808
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact