Heterogeneous approaches exist in regard to the management of disease-related co-morbidities in potential allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) candidates with myelofibrosis (MF). The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party launched an electronic survey to evaluate how MF-specific comorbidities are approached and whether they ultimately affect the decision to transplant. A total of 41/63 (65%) Centers, all of whom were experienced in the management of MF allo-HCT, responded. Responses were aggregated and reported in a comparative fashion. Screening for portal hypertension (PH) was routinely performed in 54% centers, never in 12% and guided by clinical manifestations in the remaining. Involvement of hepatologists/gastroenterologists was always/very often considered in patients with signs of PH prior to transplant. Centers reported that radiological evidence of PH did not routinely represent a formal contraindication for allo-HCT in most cases (78%). Of note, most centers (61%) did not perform routine screening for gastroesophageal varices; this was systematically considered or guided by clinical manifestations in only 7% and 32% centers, respectively. Presence of gastroesophageal varices was always (15%) or occasionally (19%) considered a formal contraindication to allo-HCT. A prior history of portal vein thrombosis never (78%) or occasionally (15%) represented a formal contraindication. Three Centers would not proceed to transplant in such cases. Less importance was assigned to non-portal splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), with all but one centre proceeding to transplant regardless of prior SVT. This survey highlights a considerable heterogeneity across responding centers in approaching MF-related comorbidities prior to transplant, suggesting that harmonisation guidelines are needed to address these issues in this patient population.

Evaluation and management of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension and portal/splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A practice based survey on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT / Battipaglia, G.; Polverelli, N.; Tuffnell, J.; Chiusolo, P.; Robin, M.; Gambella, M.; Broers, A.; Sala, E.; Passweg, J.; Furst, S.; Friis, L. S.; Dulery, R.; de Witte, M.; Srour, M.; Finazzi, M. C.; Wehr, C.; Nagler, A.; Richardson, D.; Bethge, W.; Clark, A.; Drozd-Sokolowska, J.; Raj, K.; Czerw, T.; Hernandez-Boluda, J. C.; Mclornan, D. P.. - In: CURRENT RESEARCH IN TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2452-3186. - 73:1(2025). [10.1016/j.retram.2024.103476]

Evaluation and management of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension and portal/splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A practice based survey on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Battipaglia G.
Primo
;
2025

Abstract

Heterogeneous approaches exist in regard to the management of disease-related co-morbidities in potential allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) candidates with myelofibrosis (MF). The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party launched an electronic survey to evaluate how MF-specific comorbidities are approached and whether they ultimately affect the decision to transplant. A total of 41/63 (65%) Centers, all of whom were experienced in the management of MF allo-HCT, responded. Responses were aggregated and reported in a comparative fashion. Screening for portal hypertension (PH) was routinely performed in 54% centers, never in 12% and guided by clinical manifestations in the remaining. Involvement of hepatologists/gastroenterologists was always/very often considered in patients with signs of PH prior to transplant. Centers reported that radiological evidence of PH did not routinely represent a formal contraindication for allo-HCT in most cases (78%). Of note, most centers (61%) did not perform routine screening for gastroesophageal varices; this was systematically considered or guided by clinical manifestations in only 7% and 32% centers, respectively. Presence of gastroesophageal varices was always (15%) or occasionally (19%) considered a formal contraindication to allo-HCT. A prior history of portal vein thrombosis never (78%) or occasionally (15%) represented a formal contraindication. Three Centers would not proceed to transplant in such cases. Less importance was assigned to non-portal splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), with all but one centre proceeding to transplant regardless of prior SVT. This survey highlights a considerable heterogeneity across responding centers in approaching MF-related comorbidities prior to transplant, suggesting that harmonisation guidelines are needed to address these issues in this patient population.
2025
Evaluation and management of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension and portal/splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A practice based survey on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT / Battipaglia, G.; Polverelli, N.; Tuffnell, J.; Chiusolo, P.; Robin, M.; Gambella, M.; Broers, A.; Sala, E.; Passweg, J.; Furst, S.; Friis, L. S.; Dulery, R.; de Witte, M.; Srour, M.; Finazzi, M. C.; Wehr, C.; Nagler, A.; Richardson, D.; Bethge, W.; Clark, A.; Drozd-Sokolowska, J.; Raj, K.; Czerw, T.; Hernandez-Boluda, J. C.; Mclornan, D. P.. - In: CURRENT RESEARCH IN TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2452-3186. - 73:1(2025). [10.1016/j.retram.2024.103476]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025 - Battipaglia - Portal hypertension CMWP - RETRAM.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 881.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
881.76 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/993409
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact