Regardless of what our preferences are regarding the foundations of mathematics (for example Platonism or radical constructivism), the problem remains of understanding why mathematical concepts so often appear selfevident in our cognitive experience. This is the case with the continuum and the discrete. Taking the opportunity offered by the commentators' observations, we consider the formalization presented in the target article from the perspective of this particular problem.

Authors’ response: On the Cognitive Origins of Mental Self-evidence / Totaro, Paolo; Ninno, Domenico. - In: CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS. - ISSN 1782-348X. - 19:3(2024), pp. 259-263.

Authors’ response: On the Cognitive Origins of Mental Self-evidence

Domenico Ninno
2024

Abstract

Regardless of what our preferences are regarding the foundations of mathematics (for example Platonism or radical constructivism), the problem remains of understanding why mathematical concepts so often appear selfevident in our cognitive experience. This is the case with the continuum and the discrete. Taking the opportunity offered by the commentators' observations, we consider the formalization presented in the target article from the perspective of this particular problem.
2024
Authors’ response: On the Cognitive Origins of Mental Self-evidence / Totaro, Paolo; Ninno, Domenico. - In: CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS. - ISSN 1782-348X. - 19:3(2024), pp. 259-263.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
259.totaro.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 134.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
134.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/987655
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact