Institutional investors activism is one of the hottest corporate and securities law issue. Particularly, it is well worth asking whether institutional investors can pursue a sustainable corporate governance and how EU securities regulation can foster this role. Today most retail investors hold shares through institutional shareholders, which have therefore the power to request publicly hold corporations to pay attention to sustainability. However, they do so on behalf of their beneficiaries, because they are ultimately bearing the financial results of the corporate management. The key issue is whether the corporate governance behavior of institutional investors reflect the preferences of their beneficiaries, i.e. an agency cost problem. Moreover, institutional investors include a multi-faceted variety of financial intermediaries having different relationship with their beneficiaries. There are actively managed funds and funds passively tracking a market index, which have therefore different incentives to pursue sustainable corporate governance. On these premises the essay aims to provide a synthetic but comprehensive view of how different investment strategies and behaviors of institutional investors can ameliorate the quality of corporate decisions. For this purpose, it is crucial to investigate the role of self-regulation and that of EU securities regulation in coping with the principal-agent relationship’s problem and curbing greenwashing.

Brief Remarks on Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Activism / Picardi, Lucia. - In: RIVISTA GIURIDICA EUROPEA. - ISSN 2612-2995. - 2023:1/2023(2023), pp. 7-38.

Brief Remarks on Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Activism

Picardi Lucia
2023

Abstract

Institutional investors activism is one of the hottest corporate and securities law issue. Particularly, it is well worth asking whether institutional investors can pursue a sustainable corporate governance and how EU securities regulation can foster this role. Today most retail investors hold shares through institutional shareholders, which have therefore the power to request publicly hold corporations to pay attention to sustainability. However, they do so on behalf of their beneficiaries, because they are ultimately bearing the financial results of the corporate management. The key issue is whether the corporate governance behavior of institutional investors reflect the preferences of their beneficiaries, i.e. an agency cost problem. Moreover, institutional investors include a multi-faceted variety of financial intermediaries having different relationship with their beneficiaries. There are actively managed funds and funds passively tracking a market index, which have therefore different incentives to pursue sustainable corporate governance. On these premises the essay aims to provide a synthetic but comprehensive view of how different investment strategies and behaviors of institutional investors can ameliorate the quality of corporate decisions. For this purpose, it is crucial to investigate the role of self-regulation and that of EU securities regulation in coping with the principal-agent relationship’s problem and curbing greenwashing.
2023
Brief Remarks on Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Activism / Picardi, Lucia. - In: RIVISTA GIURIDICA EUROPEA. - ISSN 2612-2995. - 2023:1/2023(2023), pp. 7-38.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
finale_LP_Brief Remarks.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Versione PDF
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 8.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/957067
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact