This work analyzes the judgement with which the Court of Cassation extended the art. 578-bis c.p.p. to urban confiscation. By doing so, it established that, in the event of a declaration of extinction due to the prescription of the crime, the judges of impugnment are required to decide on the proportionality of the confiscation, in accordance with the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.

L’ambito di attività dell’art. 578 bis c.p.p. nell’opera nomofilattica della Cassazione / Piccolo, Ilaria. - In: DIRITTO E GIUSTIZIA MINORILE. - ISSN 2280-4323. - 3/4(2022).

L’ambito di attività dell’art. 578 bis c.p.p. nell’opera nomofilattica della Cassazione.

Ilaria Piccolo
2022

Abstract

This work analyzes the judgement with which the Court of Cassation extended the art. 578-bis c.p.p. to urban confiscation. By doing so, it established that, in the event of a declaration of extinction due to the prescription of the crime, the judges of impugnment are required to decide on the proportionality of the confiscation, in accordance with the provisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
2022
L’ambito di attività dell’art. 578 bis c.p.p. nell’opera nomofilattica della Cassazione / Piccolo, Ilaria. - In: DIRITTO E GIUSTIZIA MINORILE. - ISSN 2280-4323. - 3/4(2022).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/952420
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact