Non-structural elements, such as infill walls, precast r.c., timber panels, machines, cabinets, art objects, etc. can be considered as rigid rocking blocks whose seismic vulnerability may be reduced by means of dissipative and recentering devices. These devices can be installed in dif-ferent positions of the rigid block. This paper proposes an equivalence criterion to compare dashpots installed either at the base or at the top of rocking blocks in terms of damping coef-ficients. An analytical expression is obtained and validated through deterministic and stochas-tic approaches. The first aims to compare the two scenarios' performances, while the second introduces a probabilistic assessment in terms of fragility curves and seismic demand hazard. The comparisons exhibit an optimal agreement, making the analytical formulation reliable for design purposes.
EQUIVALENCE OF DAMPING PROPERTIES OF DISSIPATIVE DEVICES FOR MITIGATING THE SEISMIC RISK OF RIGID BLOCKS / Giresini, L.; Alshawa, O.; Argiento, L. U.; Casapulla, C.. - (2023), pp. 1-18. (Intervento presentato al convegno 9th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2023 tenutosi a Athens, Greece nel 12-14 June 2023).
EQUIVALENCE OF DAMPING PROPERTIES OF DISSIPATIVE DEVICES FOR MITIGATING THE SEISMIC RISK OF RIGID BLOCKS
Argiento L. U.;Casapulla C.
2023
Abstract
Non-structural elements, such as infill walls, precast r.c., timber panels, machines, cabinets, art objects, etc. can be considered as rigid rocking blocks whose seismic vulnerability may be reduced by means of dissipative and recentering devices. These devices can be installed in dif-ferent positions of the rigid block. This paper proposes an equivalence criterion to compare dashpots installed either at the base or at the top of rocking blocks in terms of damping coef-ficients. An analytical expression is obtained and validated through deterministic and stochas-tic approaches. The first aims to compare the two scenarios' performances, while the second introduces a probabilistic assessment in terms of fragility curves and seismic demand hazard. The comparisons exhibit an optimal agreement, making the analytical formulation reliable for design purposes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.