Introduction: Commonly used visual test charts can be used to measure 1-m minimal visual acuities (VA) of 20/1000 (Snellen chart) and 1/40 (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] charts). Methods: In a prospective study, we considered all patients who visited in a Low Vision and Rehabilitation Center between September 2007 and January 2009. Distance best corrected VA (DBCVA) was evaluated with the ETDRS LogMAR 4-m chart and a customized ETDRS 1-m chart, while near best corrected VA (NBCVA) was measured with the LogMAR conversion of the Parinaud 30-cm chart. Results: One hundred and sixteen eyes (58 patients; 34 males and 24 females with a mean age of 69 ± 19.4 [19-94] years) were included in the study. Mean DBCVA was 0.97 ± 0.58 LogMAR, mean NBCVA was 0.28 ± 0.2 LogMAR. In 52 eyes (44.8%), distance VA was less than 1/20 (DBCVA 1.86 ± 0.5 LogMAR, NBCVA 0.08 ± 0.05 LogMAR). Among the 58 best seeing eyes, DBCVA was 0.87 ± 0.6 LogMAR, while NBCVA was 0.34 ± 0.2 LogMAR. In 18 of 58 cases (31%), distance VA was less than 1/20 (DBCVA 1.86 ± 0.59 and NBCVA 1.51 ± 0.42). Conclusion: In a center for low vision and visual rehabilitation, a customized chart was necessary in 31% of cases for evaluation of VA. A fine measurement of low VA is useful for baseline assessment and for evaluation of changes during rehabilitation. © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

A chart for low visual acuities: Experience in a center for low vision and rehabilitation / Bonavolonta, P.; Travade, I.; Forte, R.; Rebeyrotte, I.; Adenis, J. -P.; Robert, P. -Y.. - In: JOURNAL FRANCAIS D'OPHTALMOLOGIE. - ISSN 0181-5512. - 33:6(2010), pp. 391-396. [10.1016/j.jfo.2010.03.013]

A chart for low visual acuities: Experience in a center for low vision and rehabilitation

Bonavolonta P.;Forte R.;
2010

Abstract

Introduction: Commonly used visual test charts can be used to measure 1-m minimal visual acuities (VA) of 20/1000 (Snellen chart) and 1/40 (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] charts). Methods: In a prospective study, we considered all patients who visited in a Low Vision and Rehabilitation Center between September 2007 and January 2009. Distance best corrected VA (DBCVA) was evaluated with the ETDRS LogMAR 4-m chart and a customized ETDRS 1-m chart, while near best corrected VA (NBCVA) was measured with the LogMAR conversion of the Parinaud 30-cm chart. Results: One hundred and sixteen eyes (58 patients; 34 males and 24 females with a mean age of 69 ± 19.4 [19-94] years) were included in the study. Mean DBCVA was 0.97 ± 0.58 LogMAR, mean NBCVA was 0.28 ± 0.2 LogMAR. In 52 eyes (44.8%), distance VA was less than 1/20 (DBCVA 1.86 ± 0.5 LogMAR, NBCVA 0.08 ± 0.05 LogMAR). Among the 58 best seeing eyes, DBCVA was 0.87 ± 0.6 LogMAR, while NBCVA was 0.34 ± 0.2 LogMAR. In 18 of 58 cases (31%), distance VA was less than 1/20 (DBCVA 1.86 ± 0.59 and NBCVA 1.51 ± 0.42). Conclusion: In a center for low vision and visual rehabilitation, a customized chart was necessary in 31% of cases for evaluation of VA. A fine measurement of low VA is useful for baseline assessment and for evaluation of changes during rehabilitation. © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
2010
A chart for low visual acuities: Experience in a center for low vision and rehabilitation / Bonavolonta, P.; Travade, I.; Forte, R.; Rebeyrotte, I.; Adenis, J. -P.; Robert, P. -Y.. - In: JOURNAL FRANCAIS D'OPHTALMOLOGIE. - ISSN 0181-5512. - 33:6(2010), pp. 391-396. [10.1016/j.jfo.2010.03.013]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Interet de mesure les acuites visuelles.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 352.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
352.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/947392
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact