1. Abstract Haemorrhoids are the most common proctological disorder with a high incidence per year and a prevalence up to 39% in the general population [1]. This condition often leads to disruption in an indi vidual’s personal and working life. Management has considerable cost implications, and therefore, economic consequences [2]. Due to the fear of SARS-COVID infection the most of patients actually regret hospitalization for surgery and choose to delay the time of treatment. RBL can be proposed as successful procedure to patients with II-III grade with a short stay in the hospital. Treat ment consists initially of conservative measures such as lifestyle advice, diet and toilet behavior. When conservative hemorrhoid therapy is ineffective, many physicians may choose other non-sur gical modalities: rubber band ligation injection sclerotherapy, cryotherapy, manual dilation of the anus infrared photocoagula tion, bipolar diathermy, direct current electrocoagulation [3]. Rub ber Band Ligation (RBL) was established as one of the most im portant, cost-effective and commonly used treatments for first- to third-degree internal hemorrhoids. It is a very effective non-surgi cal treatment for internal hemorrhoids. causing fibrosis, retraction, and fixation of the hemorrhoidal cushions. Rubber band ligation is also more effective than sclerotherapy and infra-red coagulation, but more painful. Overall complications occur in less than 10%. A retrospective study of 186 patient’s outpatients who underwent RBL with a minimum follow-up of 12 months is reported. Results confirmed it is effective until 1 year with a low rate of complica tions and could be offered as conservative treatment for I

Treatment of Hemorrhoids with Rubber Band Ligation (Rbl) In A Single Outpatient Centre. Suggestions of Treatment in Sars-Covid Age / Gentile, M; Vitiello, A; Velotti, N; Berardi, G and Schiavone V. - In: CLINICS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 2638-1451. - 5:9(2021), pp. 1-6.

Treatment of Hemorrhoids with Rubber Band Ligation (Rbl) In A Single Outpatient Centre. Suggestions of Treatment in Sars-Covid Age

Gentile M
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Vitiello A;
2021

Abstract

1. Abstract Haemorrhoids are the most common proctological disorder with a high incidence per year and a prevalence up to 39% in the general population [1]. This condition often leads to disruption in an indi vidual’s personal and working life. Management has considerable cost implications, and therefore, economic consequences [2]. Due to the fear of SARS-COVID infection the most of patients actually regret hospitalization for surgery and choose to delay the time of treatment. RBL can be proposed as successful procedure to patients with II-III grade with a short stay in the hospital. Treat ment consists initially of conservative measures such as lifestyle advice, diet and toilet behavior. When conservative hemorrhoid therapy is ineffective, many physicians may choose other non-sur gical modalities: rubber band ligation injection sclerotherapy, cryotherapy, manual dilation of the anus infrared photocoagula tion, bipolar diathermy, direct current electrocoagulation [3]. Rub ber Band Ligation (RBL) was established as one of the most im portant, cost-effective and commonly used treatments for first- to third-degree internal hemorrhoids. It is a very effective non-surgi cal treatment for internal hemorrhoids. causing fibrosis, retraction, and fixation of the hemorrhoidal cushions. Rubber band ligation is also more effective than sclerotherapy and infra-red coagulation, but more painful. Overall complications occur in less than 10%. A retrospective study of 186 patient’s outpatients who underwent RBL with a minimum follow-up of 12 months is reported. Results confirmed it is effective until 1 year with a low rate of complica tions and could be offered as conservative treatment for I
2021
Treatment of Hemorrhoids with Rubber Band Ligation (Rbl) In A Single Outpatient Centre. Suggestions of Treatment in Sars-Covid Age / Gentile, M; Vitiello, A; Velotti, N; Berardi, G and Schiavone V. - In: CLINICS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 2638-1451. - 5:9(2021), pp. 1-6.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CLINICS OF SURGERY.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 207.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
207.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/919140
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact