Since 1738, archaeological sites in the area around Mount Vesuvius have produced large quantities of botanical remains, constituting the Collezione dei Commestibili e degli Avanzi organici (i.e. Collection of Edibles and Organic Remains), currently housed in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale in Naples. It is con- sidered as one of the most extensive collections from the classical world and provides in-depth evidence of Roman dietary habits. A significant portion of the material, in fact, can be attributed to food-related taxa, including a distinctive historical find consisting of thousands of uncharred remains of Vitis vinifera L. (i.e. grapevine). The carpological assemblage is composed by 6 kilos of grapes, peduncles, stalks and pips attributed to marc remains. A multidisciplinary study (morpho-anatomical and Nuclear Magnetic Reso- nance analysis, as well as Radiocarbon dating) of these specimens allowed to establish that the collection also includes ‘historically false material’. Indeed, the histological structure of the grape seeds and the lig- nified cell layers appear well preserved. Radiocarbon dating has shown that the material does not date back to the Roman period, but that the age of the Vitis remains can be placed between 1782 and 1796, the period corresponding to the first excavations carried out in the Vesuvian area. Accordingly, in order to reconstruct the history of this material, a complementary review of published works, archival records and inventories was carried out, which revealed that the first mention of this material in archival sources appeared in 1885 and has been listed incorrectly ever since. The information obtained from the survey of archival material and experimental analysis allowed to emphasize the lack of attention, study and inadequate conservation methods of archaeobotanical material.
Can plant material be considered part of cultural heritage? A lesson from Vitis vinifera L. remains stored in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli, (Italy) / D'Auria, Alessia; Marzaioli, Fabio; Passariello, Isabella; Spaccini, Riccardo; Conti, Stefano; Melchionna, Giuseppe; Teobaldelli, Maurizio; DI PASQUALE, Gaetano. - In: JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE. - ISSN 1296-2074. - (2023).
Can plant material be considered part of cultural heritage? A lesson from Vitis vinifera L. remains stored in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli, (Italy)
D'AURIA ALESSIA
Primo
Conceptualization
;SPACCINI RICCARDOFormal Analysis
;CONTI STEFANOFormal Analysis
;MELCHIONNA GIUSEPPEMethodology
;TEOBALDELLI MAURIZIOPenultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;DI PASQUALE GAETANOUltimo
Supervision
2023
Abstract
Since 1738, archaeological sites in the area around Mount Vesuvius have produced large quantities of botanical remains, constituting the Collezione dei Commestibili e degli Avanzi organici (i.e. Collection of Edibles and Organic Remains), currently housed in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale in Naples. It is con- sidered as one of the most extensive collections from the classical world and provides in-depth evidence of Roman dietary habits. A significant portion of the material, in fact, can be attributed to food-related taxa, including a distinctive historical find consisting of thousands of uncharred remains of Vitis vinifera L. (i.e. grapevine). The carpological assemblage is composed by 6 kilos of grapes, peduncles, stalks and pips attributed to marc remains. A multidisciplinary study (morpho-anatomical and Nuclear Magnetic Reso- nance analysis, as well as Radiocarbon dating) of these specimens allowed to establish that the collection also includes ‘historically false material’. Indeed, the histological structure of the grape seeds and the lig- nified cell layers appear well preserved. Radiocarbon dating has shown that the material does not date back to the Roman period, but that the age of the Vitis remains can be placed between 1782 and 1796, the period corresponding to the first excavations carried out in the Vesuvian area. Accordingly, in order to reconstruct the history of this material, a complementary review of published works, archival records and inventories was carried out, which revealed that the first mention of this material in archival sources appeared in 1885 and has been listed incorrectly ever since. The information obtained from the survey of archival material and experimental analysis allowed to emphasize the lack of attention, study and inadequate conservation methods of archaeobotanical material.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DAURIA23_PDF.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.81 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.81 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.