The aim of the essay is to discuss the ‘diacrisis’ between the Form and the Shape-less forms starting form an etymological ascent to a philosophical, aesthetic and theoretical point of view through several authors (Plato, Aristoteles, Kant, Husserl, Focillon, Battaile, Valéry, Pareyson) until architectonic thought reflection (Eisenman). The two concept of Form and Anti-Form (shapeless) are declined also under the perspective of the corresponding dialectic between modern and postmodern as defined in the opposing couples proposed by Ihab Hassan. These antinomies is at the base of the progressive and afflictive virtualization and derealization of architectural artifacts in a perspective that some have called ‘post-human’.
Form vs Anti-Forms / Capozzi, Renato. - 1:(2022), pp. 15-24. (Intervento presentato al convegno Defining Architectural Space. Avant-Garde Architecture tenutosi a Cracow University of Technology nel 18th and 19th of November 2022) [10.23817/2022.defarch.1-2].
Form vs Anti-Forms
Renato Capozzi
2022
Abstract
The aim of the essay is to discuss the ‘diacrisis’ between the Form and the Shape-less forms starting form an etymological ascent to a philosophical, aesthetic and theoretical point of view through several authors (Plato, Aristoteles, Kant, Husserl, Focillon, Battaile, Valéry, Pareyson) until architectonic thought reflection (Eisenman). The two concept of Form and Anti-Form (shapeless) are declined also under the perspective of the corresponding dialectic between modern and postmodern as defined in the opposing couples proposed by Ihab Hassan. These antinomies is at the base of the progressive and afflictive virtualization and derealization of architectural artifacts in a perspective that some have called ‘post-human’.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
