INTRODUCTION: In the last decades, there has been a marked evolution in skull base surgery techniques and more recently a combination of different corridors has been proposed and used in order to improve angles of attack, shorten working distances, and ameliorate visualization of skull base lesions. Recently, the endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes have been combined as multiportal approach to reach and treat complex skull base neoplasms. The aim of this paper is to examine data extracted from the recent literature about the feasibility and effectiveness of combined endonasal and transorbital endoscopic multiportal surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed comprehensive search of literature published until October 2020 was conducted. Nine studies, regarding 24 patients, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The majority of tumors were meningiomas (62.5%), mostly located at the spheno-orbital region (93.3%). GTR was accomplished in 10 patients (41.7%), NTR in two patients (8.3%). Endonasal transpterygoid approach (N.=8) and superior eyelid access (N.=17) were the most used routes used. No case of CSF fistula was observed, and the most common complication was a transient periorbital edema. The average hospitalization time (days) was five days. CONCLUSIONS: A combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital multiportal approach grants an adequate corridor to access several skull base tumors, such as those extending towards the paramedian aspects, providing good outcomes in terms of extent of tumor resection with acceptable rates of complications. These preliminary results might encourage the use of multiportal approaches in selected complex skull base neoplasms.

Combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to skull base tumors: a systematic literature review / Di Somma, A.; Guizzardi, G.; Cusine, C. V.; Hoyos, J.; Ferres, A.; Topczewski, T. E.; Mosteiro, A.; de Rosa, A.; Solari, D.; Cavallo, L. M.; Reyes, L.; Ensenat, J.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0390-5616. - 66:5(2022), pp. 406-412. [10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05401-1]

Combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to skull base tumors: a systematic literature review

Guizzardi G.;Solari D.;Cavallo L. M.;
2022

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the last decades, there has been a marked evolution in skull base surgery techniques and more recently a combination of different corridors has been proposed and used in order to improve angles of attack, shorten working distances, and ameliorate visualization of skull base lesions. Recently, the endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes have been combined as multiportal approach to reach and treat complex skull base neoplasms. The aim of this paper is to examine data extracted from the recent literature about the feasibility and effectiveness of combined endonasal and transorbital endoscopic multiportal surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed comprehensive search of literature published until October 2020 was conducted. Nine studies, regarding 24 patients, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The majority of tumors were meningiomas (62.5%), mostly located at the spheno-orbital region (93.3%). GTR was accomplished in 10 patients (41.7%), NTR in two patients (8.3%). Endonasal transpterygoid approach (N.=8) and superior eyelid access (N.=17) were the most used routes used. No case of CSF fistula was observed, and the most common complication was a transient periorbital edema. The average hospitalization time (days) was five days. CONCLUSIONS: A combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital multiportal approach grants an adequate corridor to access several skull base tumors, such as those extending towards the paramedian aspects, providing good outcomes in terms of extent of tumor resection with acceptable rates of complications. These preliminary results might encourage the use of multiportal approaches in selected complex skull base neoplasms.
2022
Combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to skull base tumors: a systematic literature review / Di Somma, A.; Guizzardi, G.; Cusine, C. V.; Hoyos, J.; Ferres, A.; Topczewski, T. E.; Mosteiro, A.; de Rosa, A.; Solari, D.; Cavallo, L. M.; Reyes, L.; Ensenat, J.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0390-5616. - 66:5(2022), pp. 406-412. [10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05401-1]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/901191
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact