In this short paper, in occasion of the Italian translation of Radbruch’s Rechtsphilosophie, I will offer a reading of his main work, in particular by looking at how Radbruch was able to glimpse the possibility of moral conflict and the impossibility for a constitutionally founded law to always being able to offer a juridically and morally satisfactory answer as an authentic puzzle for the philosophy of law, anticipating issues as incommensurability and tragic cases.

READING RADBRUCH’S PHILOSOPHY OF LAW: THE USEFULNESS OF MORAL CONFLICT AND CONTRADICTIONS FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE

Valerio Nitrato Izzo
2022

Abstract

In this short paper, in occasion of the Italian translation of Radbruch’s Rechtsphilosophie, I will offer a reading of his main work, in particular by looking at how Radbruch was able to glimpse the possibility of moral conflict and the impossibility for a constitutionally founded law to always being able to offer a juridically and morally satisfactory answer as an authentic puzzle for the philosophy of law, anticipating issues as incommensurability and tragic cases.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10-Reading-Radbruchs-philosophy-of-law_17.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 96.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
96.31 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/895656
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact