In this short paper, in occasion of the Italian translation of Radbruch’s Rechtsphilosophie, I will offer a reading of his main work, in particular by looking at how Radbruch was able to glimpse the possibility of moral conflict and the impossibility for a constitutionally founded law to always being able to offer a juridically and morally satisfactory answer as an authentic puzzle for the philosophy of law, anticipating issues as incommensurability and tragic cases.
READING RADBRUCH’S PHILOSOPHY OF LAW: THE USEFULNESS OF MORAL CONFLICT AND CONTRADICTIONS FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE / NITRATO IZZO, Valerio. - In: SOFT POWER, REVISTA EURO-AMERICANA DE TEORÍA E HISTORIA DE LA POLÍTICA. - ISSN 2389-8232. - 9:1(2022), pp. 211-219.
READING RADBRUCH’S PHILOSOPHY OF LAW: THE USEFULNESS OF MORAL CONFLICT AND CONTRADICTIONS FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE
Valerio Nitrato Izzo
2022
Abstract
In this short paper, in occasion of the Italian translation of Radbruch’s Rechtsphilosophie, I will offer a reading of his main work, in particular by looking at how Radbruch was able to glimpse the possibility of moral conflict and the impossibility for a constitutionally founded law to always being able to offer a juridically and morally satisfactory answer as an authentic puzzle for the philosophy of law, anticipating issues as incommensurability and tragic cases.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
10-Reading-Radbruchs-philosophy-of-law_17.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
96.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
96.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.