Since antiquity, the sense of smell (olfaction) is considered as a distance sense, just like sight and hearing. Conversely, the sense of taste (gustation) is thought to operate by direct contact, similarly to touch. With the progress of natural sciences, information at molecular, anatomical, and neurobiological levels has also contributed to the taste-smell dichotomy, but much evidence inconsistent with a sharp differentiation of these two senses has emerged, especially when considering species other than humans. In spite of this, conflicting information has been interpreted so that it could conform to the traditional differentiation. As a result, a confirmation bias is currently affecting scientific research on chemosensory systems and is also hindering the development of a satisfactory narrative of the evolution of chemical communication across taxa. From this perspective, the chemosensory dichotomy loses its validity and usefulness. We thus propose the unification of all chemosensory modalities into a single sense, moving toward a synthetic, complex, and interconnected perspective on the gradual processes by which a vast variety of chemicals have become signals that are crucially important to communication among and within cells, organs, and organisms in a wide variety of environmental conditions

Taste and Smell: A Unifying Chemosensory Theory / Mollo, Ernesto; Boero, Ferdinando; Peñuelas, Josep; Fontana, Angelo; Garson, Mary J.; Roussis, Vassilios; Cerrano, Carlo; Polese, Gianluca; Cattaneo, Alberto Maria; Mudianta, I Wayan; Genta-Jouve, Gregory; Taglialatela-Scafati, Orazio; Appendino, Giovanni; Amodeo, Pietro; Ghiselin, Michael T.. - In: THE QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0033-5770. - 97:2(2022), pp. 69-94. [10.1086/720097]

Taste and Smell: A Unifying Chemosensory Theory

Fontana, Angelo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Polese, Gianluca
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2022

Abstract

Since antiquity, the sense of smell (olfaction) is considered as a distance sense, just like sight and hearing. Conversely, the sense of taste (gustation) is thought to operate by direct contact, similarly to touch. With the progress of natural sciences, information at molecular, anatomical, and neurobiological levels has also contributed to the taste-smell dichotomy, but much evidence inconsistent with a sharp differentiation of these two senses has emerged, especially when considering species other than humans. In spite of this, conflicting information has been interpreted so that it could conform to the traditional differentiation. As a result, a confirmation bias is currently affecting scientific research on chemosensory systems and is also hindering the development of a satisfactory narrative of the evolution of chemical communication across taxa. From this perspective, the chemosensory dichotomy loses its validity and usefulness. We thus propose the unification of all chemosensory modalities into a single sense, moving toward a synthetic, complex, and interconnected perspective on the gradual processes by which a vast variety of chemicals have become signals that are crucially important to communication among and within cells, organs, and organisms in a wide variety of environmental conditions
2022
Taste and Smell: A Unifying Chemosensory Theory / Mollo, Ernesto; Boero, Ferdinando; Peñuelas, Josep; Fontana, Angelo; Garson, Mary J.; Roussis, Vassilios; Cerrano, Carlo; Polese, Gianluca; Cattaneo, Alberto Maria; Mudianta, I Wayan; Genta-Jouve, Gregory; Taglialatela-Scafati, Orazio; Appendino, Giovanni; Amodeo, Pietro; Ghiselin, Michael T.. - In: THE QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY. - ISSN 0033-5770. - 97:2(2022), pp. 69-94. [10.1086/720097]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mollo et al 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/887753
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact