We analyse the verification problem for synchronous, perfect recall multi-Agent systems with imperfect information against a specification language that includes strategic and epistemic operators. While the verification problem is unde- cidable, we show that if the agents' actions are public, then verification is 2EXPTiME-complete. To illustrate the formal framework we consider two epistemic and strategic puzzles with imperfect information and public actions: The muddy children puzzle and the classic game of battleships.

Verification of multi-Agent systems with imperfect information and public actions / Belardinelli, F.; Lomuscio, A.; Murano, A.; Rubin, S.. - 2:(2017), pp. 1268-1276. (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2017 nel 2017).

Verification of multi-Agent systems with imperfect information and public actions

Murano A.;Rubin S.
2017

Abstract

We analyse the verification problem for synchronous, perfect recall multi-Agent systems with imperfect information against a specification language that includes strategic and epistemic operators. While the verification problem is unde- cidable, we show that if the agents' actions are public, then verification is 2EXPTiME-complete. To illustrate the formal framework we consider two epistemic and strategic puzzles with imperfect information and public actions: The muddy children puzzle and the classic game of battleships.
2017
Verification of multi-Agent systems with imperfect information and public actions / Belardinelli, F.; Lomuscio, A.; Murano, A.; Rubin, S.. - 2:(2017), pp. 1268-1276. (Intervento presentato al convegno 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2017 nel 2017).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/880510
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact