In this study, the corrosion mechanisms of the AA2024-T3 and the AA2098-T351 were investigated and compared using various electrochemical techniques in 0.005 mol L−1 NaCl solution. The severe type of corrosion in the AA2098-T351 was intragranular attack (IGA) although trenching and pitting related to the constituent particles were seen. On the other hand, the AA2024-T3 exhibited severe localised corrosion associated with micrometric constituent particles, and its propagation was via grain boundaries leading to intergranular corrosion (IGC). Electrochemical techniques showed that the corrosion reaction in both alloys was controlled by diffusion. The non-uniform current distribution in both alloys showed that EIS was not a proper technique for comparing the corrosion resistance of the alloys. However, local electrochemical techniques were useful for the evaluation of the corrosion resistance of the alloys.

Comparison of the corrosion resistance of an Al–Cu alloy and an Al–Cu–Li alloy / Milagre, M. X.; Donatus, U.; Machado, C. S. C.; Araujo, J. V. S.; da Silva, R. M. P.; de Viveiros, B. V. G.; Astarita, A.; Costa, I.. - In: CORROSION ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1478-422X. - 54:5(2019), pp. 402-412. [10.1080/1478422X.2019.1605472]

Comparison of the corrosion resistance of an Al–Cu alloy and an Al–Cu–Li alloy

Astarita A.;
2019

Abstract

In this study, the corrosion mechanisms of the AA2024-T3 and the AA2098-T351 were investigated and compared using various electrochemical techniques in 0.005 mol L−1 NaCl solution. The severe type of corrosion in the AA2098-T351 was intragranular attack (IGA) although trenching and pitting related to the constituent particles were seen. On the other hand, the AA2024-T3 exhibited severe localised corrosion associated with micrometric constituent particles, and its propagation was via grain boundaries leading to intergranular corrosion (IGC). Electrochemical techniques showed that the corrosion reaction in both alloys was controlled by diffusion. The non-uniform current distribution in both alloys showed that EIS was not a proper technique for comparing the corrosion resistance of the alloys. However, local electrochemical techniques were useful for the evaluation of the corrosion resistance of the alloys.
2019
Comparison of the corrosion resistance of an Al–Cu alloy and an Al–Cu–Li alloy / Milagre, M. X.; Donatus, U.; Machado, C. S. C.; Araujo, J. V. S.; da Silva, R. M. P.; de Viveiros, B. V. G.; Astarita, A.; Costa, I.. - In: CORROSION ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1478-422X. - 54:5(2019), pp. 402-412. [10.1080/1478422X.2019.1605472]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/868444
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact