Hyaluronic Acid (HA) plays many roles in wound healing in general, through different mechanisms. everal authors reported the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in promoting mucosal healing and reducing discomfort for patients after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Different methods for HA nasal administration have been reported. The aim of our study has been to evaluate the efficacy of the administration of nebulized HA through a nasal douche compared with its administration through a nasal spray with patients undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. From January 2013 to January 2019 a prospective clinical trial was carried out in our hospital with 163 patients who had undergone ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. The sample was divided into three groups according to the method of administration of HA. Our study confirm the efficacy of the administration of nebulized HA through nasal douche in post-operative care (6.5% vs 4.5%). The most relevant data regards the nasal dryness sign: the data revealed an unexpected percentage of worsening of that sign at time T3 (p = 0.049) particularly evident in the patients treated with HA through nasal douche compared to whom the nasal spray device was prescribed (4% vs 1%). Further studies are needed to identify the best means of administration of HA, which would satisfy the requirements for efficacy in terms of the results and, at the same time, patient compliance.

A Comparative Study of Different Administrations of Nebulized Hyaluronic Acid After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis / Abbate, V.; Iaconetta, G.; Maglitto, F.; Improta, G.; Romano, A.; Bonavolontà, P.; Seidita, F; Califano, L.; Dell’Aversana Orabona, G.. - In: INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. - ISSN 2231-3796. - (2020), pp. 1-7. [10.1007/s12070-020-02110-6]

A Comparative Study of Different Administrations of Nebulized Hyaluronic Acid After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Abbate V.;Iaconetta G.;Maglitto F.;Improta G.;Bonavolontà P.;Seidita F;Califano L.;Dell’Aversana Orabona G.
2020

Abstract

Hyaluronic Acid (HA) plays many roles in wound healing in general, through different mechanisms. everal authors reported the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in promoting mucosal healing and reducing discomfort for patients after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Different methods for HA nasal administration have been reported. The aim of our study has been to evaluate the efficacy of the administration of nebulized HA through a nasal douche compared with its administration through a nasal spray with patients undergoing ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. From January 2013 to January 2019 a prospective clinical trial was carried out in our hospital with 163 patients who had undergone ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis. The sample was divided into three groups according to the method of administration of HA. Our study confirm the efficacy of the administration of nebulized HA through nasal douche in post-operative care (6.5% vs 4.5%). The most relevant data regards the nasal dryness sign: the data revealed an unexpected percentage of worsening of that sign at time T3 (p = 0.049) particularly evident in the patients treated with HA through nasal douche compared to whom the nasal spray device was prescribed (4% vs 1%). Further studies are needed to identify the best means of administration of HA, which would satisfy the requirements for efficacy in terms of the results and, at the same time, patient compliance.
2020
A Comparative Study of Different Administrations of Nebulized Hyaluronic Acid After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis / Abbate, V.; Iaconetta, G.; Maglitto, F.; Improta, G.; Romano, A.; Bonavolontà, P.; Seidita, F; Califano, L.; Dell’Aversana Orabona, G.. - In: INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. - ISSN 2231-3796. - (2020), pp. 1-7. [10.1007/s12070-020-02110-6]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Abbate2020_Article_AComparativeStudyOfDifferentAd[1].pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 848.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
848.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/832360
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact