Background and aim Intermediate care describes services, including transitional care, that support the needs of middle-aged and older adults during care transitions and between different settings. This scoping review aimed to examine the effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions for middle-aged and older adults on function, healthcare utilisation, and costs. Design A scoping review of the literature was conducted including studies published between 2002 and 2019 with a transitional care and/or intermediate care intervention for adults aged ≥ 50. Searches were performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Open Grey and PubMed databases. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were employed for data synthesis. Results In all, 133 studies were included. Interventions were grouped under four models of care: (a) Hospital-based transitional care (n = 8), (b) Transitional care delivered at discharge and up to 30 days after discharge (n = 70), (c) Intermediate care at home (n = 41), and (d) Intermediate care delivered in a community hospital, care home or post-acute facility (n = 14). While these models were associated with a reduced hospital stay, this was not universal. Intermediate including transitional care services combined with telephone follow-up and coaching support were reported to reduce short and long-term hospital re-admissions. Evidence for improved ADL function was strongest for intermediate care delivered by an interdisciplinary team with rehabilitation at home. Study design and types of interventions were markedly heterogenous, limiting comparability. Conclusions Although many studies report that intermediate care including transitional care models reduce hospital utilisation, results were mixed. There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of these services on function, institutionalisation, emergency department attendances, or on cost-effectiveness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00365-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review / Duygu, Sezgin; Rónán, O’Caoimh; Aaron, Liew; Mark R., O’Donovan; Illario, Maddalena; Mohamed A., Salem; Siobhán, Kennelly; Ana María, Carriazo; Luz, Lopez-Samaniego; Cristina Arnal, Carda; Rafael, Rodriguez-Acuña; Marco, Inzitari; Teija, Hammar; Anne, Hendry. - In: EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE. - ISSN 1878-7649. - (2020).

The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review.

Illario;
2020

Abstract

Background and aim Intermediate care describes services, including transitional care, that support the needs of middle-aged and older adults during care transitions and between different settings. This scoping review aimed to examine the effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions for middle-aged and older adults on function, healthcare utilisation, and costs. Design A scoping review of the literature was conducted including studies published between 2002 and 2019 with a transitional care and/or intermediate care intervention for adults aged ≥ 50. Searches were performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Open Grey and PubMed databases. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were employed for data synthesis. Results In all, 133 studies were included. Interventions were grouped under four models of care: (a) Hospital-based transitional care (n = 8), (b) Transitional care delivered at discharge and up to 30 days after discharge (n = 70), (c) Intermediate care at home (n = 41), and (d) Intermediate care delivered in a community hospital, care home or post-acute facility (n = 14). While these models were associated with a reduced hospital stay, this was not universal. Intermediate including transitional care services combined with telephone follow-up and coaching support were reported to reduce short and long-term hospital re-admissions. Evidence for improved ADL function was strongest for intermediate care delivered by an interdisciplinary team with rehabilitation at home. Study design and types of interventions were markedly heterogenous, limiting comparability. Conclusions Although many studies report that intermediate care including transitional care models reduce hospital utilisation, results were mixed. There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of these services on function, institutionalisation, emergency department attendances, or on cost-effectiveness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00365-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
2020
The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review / Duygu, Sezgin; Rónán, O’Caoimh; Aaron, Liew; Mark R., O’Donovan; Illario, Maddalena; Mohamed A., Salem; Siobhán, Kennelly; Ana María, Carriazo; Luz, Lopez-Samaniego; Cristina Arnal, Carda; Rafael, Rodriguez-Acuña; Marco, Inzitari; Teija, Hammar; Anne, Hendry. - In: EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE. - ISSN 1878-7649. - (2020).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs- a scoping review..pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/826716
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact