This paper discusses the seismic vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings designed to gravity loads only, which are representative of the Italian building stock mainly erected between ‘70s and ‘80s, and investigates the use of external steel concentric bracing systems to upgrade their seismic performance. A case study building has been selected and designed according to the codes and the current practice in force at the time of construction. The seismic performance has been evaluated through the so-called N2 method in the format of the Capacity Spectrum Method applied to three different models of the building, namely bare frame, full infilled frame and pilotis frame, to highlight the role of the infill walls arrangement. The three models have been retrofitted with the external bracing systems designed with an adopted rational methodology. The external arrangement of the bracing systems has been chosen in order to both minimize the impact on the existing building and avoid the local interaction between the RC structural elements and the steel bracings, as well as the additional loads on the existing foundations. The results have shown the strong role of the infills in the structural behaviour of the existing building and the efficiency of the external steel bracing systems as retrofitting technique of existing RC buildings.

Seismic retrofit of gravity load designed RC buildings using external steel concentric bracing systems / Formisano, A.; Massimilla, A.; Di Lorenzo, G.; Landolfo, R.. - In: ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS. - ISSN 1350-6307. - 111:104485(2020), pp. 1-21. [10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104485]

Seismic retrofit of gravity load designed RC buildings using external steel concentric bracing systems

Formisano A.
Methodology
;
Di Lorenzo G.
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Landolfo R.
Supervision
2020

Abstract

This paper discusses the seismic vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings designed to gravity loads only, which are representative of the Italian building stock mainly erected between ‘70s and ‘80s, and investigates the use of external steel concentric bracing systems to upgrade their seismic performance. A case study building has been selected and designed according to the codes and the current practice in force at the time of construction. The seismic performance has been evaluated through the so-called N2 method in the format of the Capacity Spectrum Method applied to three different models of the building, namely bare frame, full infilled frame and pilotis frame, to highlight the role of the infill walls arrangement. The three models have been retrofitted with the external bracing systems designed with an adopted rational methodology. The external arrangement of the bracing systems has been chosen in order to both minimize the impact on the existing building and avoid the local interaction between the RC structural elements and the steel bracings, as well as the additional loads on the existing foundations. The results have shown the strong role of the infills in the structural behaviour of the existing building and the efficiency of the external steel bracing systems as retrofitting technique of existing RC buildings.
2020
Seismic retrofit of gravity load designed RC buildings using external steel concentric bracing systems / Formisano, A.; Massimilla, A.; Di Lorenzo, G.; Landolfo, R.. - In: ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS. - ISSN 1350-6307. - 111:104485(2020), pp. 1-21. [10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104485]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Formisano et al - retrofitting RC structures by steel bracings-2020.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.64 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/817443
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact