This study demonstrated that it is possible to differentiate wild boars living in habitats with different animal densities by the measurement of oxidative stress markers. Therefore, reactive oxygen metabolites, the antioxidant barrier, i.e., the biological antioxidant potential and the antioxidative power (OXY-Adsorbent), as well as cortisol were measured in freely ranging wild boars. In two different areas of a State Forest in the Campania Region (Italy), 42 freely ranging, managed wild boars were captured with a corral trap, and blood samples were collected. The wild boars were divided by age (>1 year old and <1 year old) and sex (male and female). Animals in one area showed significantly higher values of oxidative stress parameters than those living in the other area. The annual boar censuses of areas highlighted a higher population density in the first area than in the second one, and this would explain the results obtained. Since the health or nutritional status of animals is reflected by oxidative stress, wild boars in areas with higher animal densities may live under worse conditions than animals in areas with lower densities which becomes evident by measuring oxidative stress markers. As cortisol in blood is only reflecting a short period, the measurement of oxidative stress level may be a better indicator to evaluate the living conditions of wild boars.

Assessment of living conditions in wild boars by analysis of oxidative stress markers / Esposito, Luigi; Tafuri, S.; Cocchia, N.; Fasanelli, R.; Piscopo, N.; Lamagna, B.; Eguren, V.; Amici, A.; Iorio, E.; Ciani, Francesca. - In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE. - ISSN 1088-8705. - 24:1(2021), pp. 64-71. [10.1080/10888705.2020.1790365]

Assessment of living conditions in wild boars by analysis of oxidative stress markers

Esposito Luigi;S. Tafuri
;
N. Cocchia;R. Fasanelli;N. Piscopo;B. Lamagna;E. Iorio;Francesca Ciani.
2021

Abstract

This study demonstrated that it is possible to differentiate wild boars living in habitats with different animal densities by the measurement of oxidative stress markers. Therefore, reactive oxygen metabolites, the antioxidant barrier, i.e., the biological antioxidant potential and the antioxidative power (OXY-Adsorbent), as well as cortisol were measured in freely ranging wild boars. In two different areas of a State Forest in the Campania Region (Italy), 42 freely ranging, managed wild boars were captured with a corral trap, and blood samples were collected. The wild boars were divided by age (>1 year old and <1 year old) and sex (male and female). Animals in one area showed significantly higher values of oxidative stress parameters than those living in the other area. The annual boar censuses of areas highlighted a higher population density in the first area than in the second one, and this would explain the results obtained. Since the health or nutritional status of animals is reflected by oxidative stress, wild boars in areas with higher animal densities may live under worse conditions than animals in areas with lower densities which becomes evident by measuring oxidative stress markers. As cortisol in blood is only reflecting a short period, the measurement of oxidative stress level may be a better indicator to evaluate the living conditions of wild boars.
2021
Assessment of living conditions in wild boars by analysis of oxidative stress markers / Esposito, Luigi; Tafuri, S.; Cocchia, N.; Fasanelli, R.; Piscopo, N.; Lamagna, B.; Eguren, V.; Amici, A.; Iorio, E.; Ciani, Francesca. - In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE. - ISSN 1088-8705. - 24:1(2021), pp. 64-71. [10.1080/10888705.2020.1790365]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Esposito et al. 2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 522.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.17 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/813982
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact