1.- The measurability of the factors determining the judicial ruling; 2.- Jurisprudence’s difference from precedent; 3.- Examples from civil law systems; 3.1. France; 3.2. Italy; 3.3. Brazil; 4.- The goal to prevent the trial of identifying and measuring the jurisprudence’s normativity from being creative;5.- The quotient to be assigned with non-arbitrary criteria to each element concurring to the normative range of a decision; 6.- The measurement’s technique: a continous scale «0 1»; 7. The proposal’s impact on the hypotesis of a single precedent to be equalized to the settled case law.
QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO STUDY THE NORMATIVITY OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF COURTS IN COUNTRIES FROM THE CIVIL LAW TRADITION / Auletta, Ferruccio. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROCEDURAL LAW. - ISSN 2034-5275. - 1/2020(2020), pp. 108-118.
QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO STUDY THE NORMATIVITY OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF COURTS IN COUNTRIES FROM THE CIVIL LAW TRADITION
Ferruccio Auletta
2020
Abstract
1.- The measurability of the factors determining the judicial ruling; 2.- Jurisprudence’s difference from precedent; 3.- Examples from civil law systems; 3.1. France; 3.2. Italy; 3.3. Brazil; 4.- The goal to prevent the trial of identifying and measuring the jurisprudence’s normativity from being creative;5.- The quotient to be assigned with non-arbitrary criteria to each element concurring to the normative range of a decision; 6.- The measurement’s technique: a continous scale «0 1»; 7. The proposal’s impact on the hypotesis of a single precedent to be equalized to the settled case law.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


