In the recent architectural debate, there has been a renewed interest on the topi c of brutalist architecture as a sign fora search of a different point of view and a necessity of filling the void in the architectural historiography. Striving to go beyond the conventional opin ions on Brutalism, the two researchers presented in this paper are collocated in this context: 99FILES project, an open international cali, promoted by the research Laboratory Landscape_inProgress, and OPERATIVE ATLAS of 15 case studies from Skopje. Both of the projects intend lo become a device for re-thinking of Brutalism as well as to develop a reflection from which to learn how to deepen into the knowledge of the architectural production of the 60s and the 70s. This different vision becomes fundamental for Skopje, where the architectural and cultura! heritage, built after the earthquake in 1963, has always been marginalised and is now in danger to be erased. By overcoming the ideologica! barriers, it is possible to re-read other modernities that ha ve characterised the Balkan architecture, and reassign what is now perceived as an unloved heritage (Mrduljas, M., Kulié, V. 2012), a familiariLy in the urban physiognomy.

Brutalismo tettonico / Capozzi, Renato. - (2020), pp. 4-4. [10.1057/s41289-020-00120-y]

Brutalismo tettonico

Renato CAPOZZI
2020

Abstract

In the recent architectural debate, there has been a renewed interest on the topi c of brutalist architecture as a sign fora search of a different point of view and a necessity of filling the void in the architectural historiography. Striving to go beyond the conventional opin ions on Brutalism, the two researchers presented in this paper are collocated in this context: 99FILES project, an open international cali, promoted by the research Laboratory Landscape_inProgress, and OPERATIVE ATLAS of 15 case studies from Skopje. Both of the projects intend lo become a device for re-thinking of Brutalism as well as to develop a reflection from which to learn how to deepen into the knowledge of the architectural production of the 60s and the 70s. This different vision becomes fundamental for Skopje, where the architectural and cultura! heritage, built after the earthquake in 1963, has always been marginalised and is now in danger to be erased. By overcoming the ideologica! barriers, it is possible to re-read other modernities that ha ve characterised the Balkan architecture, and reassign what is now perceived as an unloved heritage (Mrduljas, M., Kulié, V. 2012), a familiariLy in the urban physiognomy.
2020
Brutalismo tettonico / Capozzi, Renato. - (2020), pp. 4-4. [10.1057/s41289-020-00120-y]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/806704
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact