I present the reflection “Economic goods or solidarity? Two different approaches to liberality”. Taking the comparison between the Aristotelian and Stoic concepts of liberality as starting point, I demonstrate that Aristotle, guided by the passion and reason dualism, is forced to think of liberality as a virtue of individualcharacter, which prevails over the natural attachment to riches and goods. Ultimately, I aim to show how the virtue of liberality comes from the social dimension of the moral good
Economic goods or solidarity? Two different approaches to liberality / Giammusso, Salvatore. - In: AORISTO. - ISSN 2526-592X. - 5:1(2020), pp. 81-105.
Economic goods or solidarity? Two different approaches to liberality
Salvatore Giammusso
2020
Abstract
I present the reflection “Economic goods or solidarity? Two different approaches to liberality”. Taking the comparison between the Aristotelian and Stoic concepts of liberality as starting point, I demonstrate that Aristotle, guided by the passion and reason dualism, is forced to think of liberality as a virtue of individualcharacter, which prevails over the natural attachment to riches and goods. Ultimately, I aim to show how the virtue of liberality comes from the social dimension of the moral good| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Giammusso - Economic goods or solidarity.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
500.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
500.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
