We study the effect of a reduction in employment protection on workers’ fertility decisions. Using data from the Italian Labor Force Survey for 2013-2018, we analyze how the propensity to have a child has been affected by the 2015 labor market reform dubbed the “Jobs Act,” which reduced employment protection for employees of larger firms while leaving small firms essentially untouched. We take a Difference-in-Differences identification approach and compare the change in fertility decisions of women employed in large firms with that of women in small firms. We find that the former’s probability of having a child is 1.4 percentage points lower. A battery of robustness checks confirms this finding. The effect also holds when possible sorting issues are accounted for by an instrumental variable approach. We document substantial heterogeneous effects by age, marital status, parity, and geographical area as well as by education and earnings. Our findings suggest the potential unintended consequences on fertility that labor market reforms introducing greater flexibility may have by heightening career insecurity.

Employment protection and fertility decisions: The unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act / DE PAOLA, Maria; Nistico', Roberto; Scoppa, Vincenzo. - In: ECONOMIC POLICY. - ISSN 1468-0327. - 36:108(2021), pp. 735-773. [10.1093/epolic/eiab015]

Employment protection and fertility decisions: The unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act

Maria De Paola;Roberto Nistico'
;
Vincenzo Scoppa
2021

Abstract

We study the effect of a reduction in employment protection on workers’ fertility decisions. Using data from the Italian Labor Force Survey for 2013-2018, we analyze how the propensity to have a child has been affected by the 2015 labor market reform dubbed the “Jobs Act,” which reduced employment protection for employees of larger firms while leaving small firms essentially untouched. We take a Difference-in-Differences identification approach and compare the change in fertility decisions of women employed in large firms with that of women in small firms. We find that the former’s probability of having a child is 1.4 percentage points lower. A battery of robustness checks confirms this finding. The effect also holds when possible sorting issues are accounted for by an instrumental variable approach. We document substantial heterogeneous effects by age, marital status, parity, and geographical area as well as by education and earnings. Our findings suggest the potential unintended consequences on fertility that labor market reforms introducing greater flexibility may have by heightening career insecurity.
2021
Employment protection and fertility decisions: The unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act / DE PAOLA, Maria; Nistico', Roberto; Scoppa, Vincenzo. - In: ECONOMIC POLICY. - ISSN 1468-0327. - 36:108(2021), pp. 735-773. [10.1093/epolic/eiab015]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/798021
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact