Among patients with documented stable coronary artery disease and in whom no revascularization was performed, we compared the respective values of angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in predicting natural history.
Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy / Ciccarelli, Giovanni; Barbato, Emanuele; Toth, Gabor G; Gahl, Brigitta; Xaplanteris, Panagiotis; Fournier, Stephane; Milkas, Anastasios; Bartunek, Jozef; Vanderheyden, Marc; Pijls, Nico; Tonino, Pim; Fearon, William F; Jüni, Peter; De Bruyne, Bernard. - In: CIRCULATION. - ISSN 1524-4539. - 137:14(2018), p. 1475-1485. [10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782]
Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy
Barbato, EmanueleMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2018
Abstract
Among patients with documented stable coronary artery disease and in whom no revascularization was performed, we compared the respective values of angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in predicting natural history.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
