Evaluating gender equity involves the assessment of the equality of opportunities and the equality of outcomes that public policies seek to attain for women and men. It focuses on how and to what extent both genders cooperate to expand access to paid work and control over material resources while sharing care and reproductive responsibilities. Drawing on complexity theory, this article puts forward a theoretical framework to identify cooperative behaviors within the household and the workplace as well as within broader socioeconomic, political and institutional domains.

Cooperating for a more egalitarian society: Complexity theory to evaluate gender equity / Marra, Mita. - In: EVALUATION. - ISSN 1356-3890. - 21 (1):(2015), pp. 32-46. [10.1177/1356389014564856]

Cooperating for a more egalitarian society: Complexity theory to evaluate gender equity

Mita Marra
2015

Abstract

Evaluating gender equity involves the assessment of the equality of opportunities and the equality of outcomes that public policies seek to attain for women and men. It focuses on how and to what extent both genders cooperate to expand access to paid work and control over material resources while sharing care and reproductive responsibilities. Drawing on complexity theory, this article puts forward a theoretical framework to identify cooperative behaviors within the household and the workplace as well as within broader socioeconomic, political and institutional domains.
2015
Cooperating for a more egalitarian society: Complexity theory to evaluate gender equity / Marra, Mita. - In: EVALUATION. - ISSN 1356-3890. - 21 (1):(2015), pp. 32-46. [10.1177/1356389014564856]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Evaluation-2015-Marra-32-46.pdf

non disponibili

Dimensione 378.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
378.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/738716
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact