In Opinion 3/15, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the conclusion of the Marrakesh Treaty, aimed at facilitating access to published works by people with visual disabilities, falls within the exclusive competence of the EU insofar as that agreement may “alter the scope” of the provisions set out in Directive 2001/29, on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. This comment examines the application of the ERTA rule in Opinion 3/15 as well as the ECJ’s assessment of the external pre-emptive effects of minimum and partial harmonisation directives.
The ERTA Pre-emption Effects of Minimum and Partial Harmonisation Directives: Insights from Opinion 3/15 on the Competence to Conclude the Marrakesh Treaty / Arena, Amedeo. - In: EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW. - ISSN 0307-5400. - 5(2018), pp. 770-779.
The ERTA Pre-emption Effects of Minimum and Partial Harmonisation Directives: Insights from Opinion 3/15 on the Competence to Conclude the Marrakesh Treaty
Amedeo Arena
2018
Abstract
In Opinion 3/15, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the conclusion of the Marrakesh Treaty, aimed at facilitating access to published works by people with visual disabilities, falls within the exclusive competence of the EU insofar as that agreement may “alter the scope” of the provisions set out in Directive 2001/29, on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. This comment examines the application of the ERTA rule in Opinion 3/15 as well as the ECJ’s assessment of the external pre-emptive effects of minimum and partial harmonisation directives.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
