The distinctive anatomy and physiology of the upper gastrointestinal tract and the difficulty of obtaining samples led to the theory that it was bacteria free. However, multiomics studies are indicating otherwise. Although influenced by both oral and gastric bacteria, the resident microbial ecosystem in the oesophagus is dominated by Streptococcus. A shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria occurs in oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus, and this shift might be involved in the pathogenesis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The gastric microenvironment is populated by microbial communities mainly of the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phyla and species of the Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Propionibacterium genera. The composition of gastric microbiota is highly dynamic, and is influenced by acid suppression, gastric inflammation, and Helicobacter pylori. Duodenal microbes are also implicated in the onset and outcome of coeliac disease. Bacteria of the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Staphylococcus dominate the duodenal flora in active coeliac disease whereas lactobacilli and bifidobacteria decrease. Although knowledge of the composition of the microbiota of the upper gastrointestinal tract has advanced substantially, this information is far from being translated to the clinical setting. In this Review, we assess the data related to the potential contribution of microbes to the susceptibility for and pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal diseases.

A microbiota-centric view of diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract / Nardone, Gerardo; Compare, Debora; Rocco, Alba. - In: THE LANCET. GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 2468-1253. - 2:4(2017), pp. 298-312. [10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30108-X]

A microbiota-centric view of diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Nardone, Gerardo
;
Compare, Debora;Rocco, Alba
2017

Abstract

The distinctive anatomy and physiology of the upper gastrointestinal tract and the difficulty of obtaining samples led to the theory that it was bacteria free. However, multiomics studies are indicating otherwise. Although influenced by both oral and gastric bacteria, the resident microbial ecosystem in the oesophagus is dominated by Streptococcus. A shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria occurs in oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus, and this shift might be involved in the pathogenesis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The gastric microenvironment is populated by microbial communities mainly of the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phyla and species of the Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Propionibacterium genera. The composition of gastric microbiota is highly dynamic, and is influenced by acid suppression, gastric inflammation, and Helicobacter pylori. Duodenal microbes are also implicated in the onset and outcome of coeliac disease. Bacteria of the genera Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Staphylococcus dominate the duodenal flora in active coeliac disease whereas lactobacilli and bifidobacteria decrease. Although knowledge of the composition of the microbiota of the upper gastrointestinal tract has advanced substantially, this information is far from being translated to the clinical setting. In this Review, we assess the data related to the potential contribution of microbes to the susceptibility for and pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal diseases.
2017
A microbiota-centric view of diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract / Nardone, Gerardo; Compare, Debora; Rocco, Alba. - In: THE LANCET. GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 2468-1253. - 2:4(2017), pp. 298-312. [10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30108-X]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lancet Gastr Hep 2017 2.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 248.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
248.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/712976
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact