Nematode infections in horses are widespread across the world. Increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance, reported worldwide in equine parasites, have led to the creation of programs for the control of nematodes based on faecal egg counts (FEC). To improve nematode egg counting in equine faecal samples and establish whether the matrix of equine faeces or the eggs affect the counts, the analytical sensitivity, accuracy and precision of Mini-FLOTAC (combined with Fill-FLOTAC), McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin techniques were compared. Known numbers of eggs extracted from equine or ovine faeces were added to egg free ovine and equine faeces to give counts of 10, 50, 200 and 500 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces. Results: The Cornell-Wisconsin significantly underestimated egg counts and McMaster showed a low analytical sensitivity, revealing 100% of sensitivity only for concentrations greater than 200 EPG. EPG values detected by Mini-FLOTAC did not differ significantly from expected counts at any level of egg density. Conclusions: Mini-FLOTAC combined to Fill-FLOTAC which provides an accurate method of weighing without need for a balance and filtering out debris, could be used for FEC on the farm as well as in the laboratory.

The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods / Bosco, Antonio; Maurelli, Maria Paola; Ianniello, Davide; Morgoglione, Maria Elena; Amadesi, Alessandra; Coles, Gerald C; Cringoli, Giuseppe; Rinaldi, Laura. - In: BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH. - ISSN 1746-6148. - 14:1(2018), p. 7. [10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7]

The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods

Bosco, Antonio
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Maurelli, Maria Paola
Secondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Ianniello, Davide
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Morgoglione, Maria Elena
Data Curation
;
Amadesi, Alessandra
Data Curation
;
Cringoli, Giuseppe
Penultimo
Conceptualization
;
Rinaldi, Laura
Ultimo
Conceptualization
2018

Abstract

Nematode infections in horses are widespread across the world. Increasing levels of anthelmintic resistance, reported worldwide in equine parasites, have led to the creation of programs for the control of nematodes based on faecal egg counts (FEC). To improve nematode egg counting in equine faecal samples and establish whether the matrix of equine faeces or the eggs affect the counts, the analytical sensitivity, accuracy and precision of Mini-FLOTAC (combined with Fill-FLOTAC), McMaster and Cornell-Wisconsin techniques were compared. Known numbers of eggs extracted from equine or ovine faeces were added to egg free ovine and equine faeces to give counts of 10, 50, 200 and 500 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces. Results: The Cornell-Wisconsin significantly underestimated egg counts and McMaster showed a low analytical sensitivity, revealing 100% of sensitivity only for concentrations greater than 200 EPG. EPG values detected by Mini-FLOTAC did not differ significantly from expected counts at any level of egg density. Conclusions: Mini-FLOTAC combined to Fill-FLOTAC which provides an accurate method of weighing without need for a balance and filtering out debris, could be used for FEC on the farm as well as in the laboratory.
2018
The recovery of added nematode eggs from horse and sheep faeces by three methods / Bosco, Antonio; Maurelli, Maria Paola; Ianniello, Davide; Morgoglione, Maria Elena; Amadesi, Alessandra; Coles, Gerald C; Cringoli, Giuseppe; Rinaldi, Laura. - In: BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH. - ISSN 1746-6148. - 14:1(2018), p. 7. [10.1186/s12917-017-1326-7]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bosco et al., 2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 793.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
793.22 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/700228
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact