As the second term of our commitment to Journal begins, we, the editors, would like to reflect on a few topics that have relevance today. These include prognostication and paradigm shifts; Serial testing: How to handle data? Is the change in perfusion predictive of outcome and which one? Ischemia-guided therapy: fractional flow reserve vs perfusion vs myocardial blood flow; positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Rubidium-82 vs N-13 ammonia vs F-18 Flurpiridaz; How to differentiate microvascular disease from 3-vessel disease by PET? The imaging scene outside the United States, what are the differences and similarities? Radiation exposure; Special issues with the new cameras? Is attenuation correction needed? Are there normal databases and are these specific to each camera system? And finally, hybrid imaging with single-photon emission tomography or PET combined with computed tomography angiography or coronary calcium score. We hope these topics are of interest to our readers.

Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update / Iskandrian, A.E., Dilsizian, V., Garcia, E.V., Beanlands, R.S., Cerqueira, M., Soman, P., Berman, D.S., Cuocolo, A., Einstein, A.J., Morgan, C.J., Hage, F.G., Schelbert, H.R., Bax, J.J., Wu, J.C., Shaw, L.J., Sadeghi, M.M., Tamaki, N., Kaufmann, P.A., Gropler, R., Dorbala, S., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1071-3581. - 25:1(2018), pp. 39-52. [10.1007/s12350-017-1093-7]

Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update

CUOCOLO, ALBERTO;
2018

Abstract

As the second term of our commitment to Journal begins, we, the editors, would like to reflect on a few topics that have relevance today. These include prognostication and paradigm shifts; Serial testing: How to handle data? Is the change in perfusion predictive of outcome and which one? Ischemia-guided therapy: fractional flow reserve vs perfusion vs myocardial blood flow; positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Rubidium-82 vs N-13 ammonia vs F-18 Flurpiridaz; How to differentiate microvascular disease from 3-vessel disease by PET? The imaging scene outside the United States, what are the differences and similarities? Radiation exposure; Special issues with the new cameras? Is attenuation correction needed? Are there normal databases and are these specific to each camera system? And finally, hybrid imaging with single-photon emission tomography or PET combined with computed tomography angiography or coronary calcium score. We hope these topics are of interest to our readers.
2018
Myocardial perfusion imaging: Lessons learned and work to be done-update / Iskandrian, A.E., Dilsizian, V., Garcia, E.V., Beanlands, R.S., Cerqueira, M., Soman, P., Berman, D.S., Cuocolo, A., Einstein, A.J., Morgan, C.J., Hage, F.G., Schelbert, H.R., Bax, J.J., Wu, J.C., Shaw, L.J., Sadeghi, M.M., Tamaki, N., Kaufmann, P.A., Gropler, R., Dorbala, S., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1071-3581. - 25:1(2018), pp. 39-52. [10.1007/s12350-017-1093-7]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/692530
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact